From ragnarok@pobox.com Sun Jun 10 11:42:49 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 10 Jun 2001 18:42:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 13218 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2001 18:42:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 10 Jun 2001 18:42:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO intrex.net) (209.42.192.246) by mta3 with SMTP; 10 Jun 2001 18:42:48 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.34] by intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AFA7532E00B2; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:42:47 -0400 Reply-To: To: Subject: RE: [lojban] An approach to attitudinals Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:42:45 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20010610142713.A550@twcny.rr.com> X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" > However, if that doesn't work, there is also this possibility: It does, at least for me. > * Attitudinals always affect the truth value of the sentence. Best idea yet! let's go with it. But what does .ui do in a sentence? --la kreig.daniyl 'segu temci fa le bavli gi mi'o ba renvi lo purci .i ga la fonxa cu janbe gi du mi' -la djimis.BYFet pgp public key ID: 0x5C3A1E74