From jorge@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx Fri May 28 19:33:34 1999
X-Digest-Num: 151
Message-ID: <44114.151.904.959273824@eGroups.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:33:34 -0300
From: "=?US-ASCII?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" <jorge@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx
Subject: Re: bridi place structure with unusual tertau


>I guess the question really is : are linked sumti on the tertau treated as
>though they're at the start of the tail_terms of the bridi?


You didn't ask what this one means:

(6) ko'a ko'e broda be ko'i 

My guess is that ko'i is still broda2. If I'm right that would 
mean that linked sumti are not just at the start of the tail_terms.
But I don't know whether that makes ko'e broda3 or a
superposition of broda2. This can happen sometimes:
{ko'a broda fa ko'e fa ko'i}. 

My answer is that I don't know, and that it's not a good
idea to use linked sumti with the tertau anyway.

co'o mi'e xorxes