From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 13 14:43:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 13 Aug 2001 21:43:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 33556 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 21:41:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Aug 2001 21:41:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.169.75.101) by mta2 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 21:41:01 -0000 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15WPSF-00044q-00 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:40:59 -0700 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:40:59 -0700 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Logflash on Linux up and running Message-ID: <20010813144059.W9477@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <3B78484C.2080605@reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B78484C.2080605@reutershealth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i From: Robin Lee Powell On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 05:36:12PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Logflash then worked perfectly!! I worship your amazingness, and apologize for my own suckitude. I swear I did try this at one point, but not with that compiler. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno je xlali -- RLP http://www.lojban.org/