From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Aug 16 08:49:14 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_1); 16 Aug 2001 15:49:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 94708 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2001 15:48:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Aug 2001 15:48:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO n15.groups.yahoo.com) (10.1.1.31) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 15:47:57 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.2.225] by ml.egroups.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2001 15:47:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:47:52 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: hung names Message-ID: <9lgpv8+f0nl@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 538 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "A.W.T." --- In lojban@y..., Andrew Smith wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001 BestATN@a... wrote: >=20 > > to Andrew Smith > > andrew@l... > > re: ... Likewise Eo"tvo"s and Eszterha'zy. > >=20 > > Eszterh=E1zy was explained here, but how is Eo"tvo"s pronounced differe= nt=3D=0D ly=20 > > from its spelling? > >=20 > > Steven Lytle > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > I think Eo"tvo"s is pronounced without the initial e, as if it was spelt > o"tvo"s. There isn't any difference in pronunciation, but in spelling: E=F6tv=F6s-> = =D6tv=F6=3D=0D s; We=F6res->V=F6r=F6s .aulun.