[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bpfk-announce] {Please Read} lerfu Checkpoint Ends Wed, 17 Mar 2004, administrative issues



At Rob Speer's request, I have applied the changes Nora suggested to the
'lerfu Shifts' section; he's apparently been having trouble connecting
to the wiki.

At this point, there are no outstanding issues that I am aware of at
all.  If no-one brings up anything else, this checkpoint closes this
coming Wednesday.

The current vote status is as follows:

I accept and agree with the current contents of "BPFK Section: lerfu
Forming cmavo".
    7 votes
I do not accept or agree with the current contents of "BPFK Section:
lerfu Forming cmavo".
    1 vote
I agree with the current contents of BPFK Section: lerfu
    5 votes
I do not agree with the current contents of BPFK Section: lerfu
    1 vote
I agree with the contents of BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts.
    7 votes
I do not agree with the contents of BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts.
    1 vote

The votes against were all by one person, who has not come forward to
explain eir reasons, nor has responded to my private requests to do so.
I consider voting against a proposal without explanation to be very
strongly against the spirit of this body, but I had not made this clear
in the past, so nothing will be done this time.

A note about this has been added to the Procedures section.  It is very
strongly worded.  I can't over-emphasize how important this issue is.
If people who disagree with a proposal don't explain why, we can't make
Lojban the best it can be.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui