In a message dated 2/17/2002 4:39:18 PM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes:In ro velvecnu, the nalsku gadri is lo, which can refer to multiple But you talke them up one at a time, not as a set or even a mass. So your pattern is the same as that of xorxes to which you objected. <You're right: "f(x)" and "x + 2" are related by cmene, and probably sinxa, tcita, and smuni.> Not likely, both "f(x)" and "x+1" are expressions and all these relations seem to be between and _expression_ and something that is not an _expression_ (well, {smuni} might be read as "means the same as" between expressions). <In jei mi tervecnu, it's true that the one value used in that range is 1. But the value of jei spans [0, 1], so in general, that is a real quantity.> Again, {lo'i} for {le} would be safer. |