Received: from mail-qa0-f61.google.com ([209.85.216.61]:44297) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T1i3S-0000Lr-2D; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:59 -0700 Received: by qadz32 with SMTP id z32sf2078685qad.16 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type; bh=h8OZmDHJX2EiiP1sUtGqyfCxklZYFl4F4rPlN+E2KRg=; b=H+EJoTpibN2R7UG03R8AaTUpXytbCpUiQk9AK8dOUMic+D+ASkvVLV6+HfZqUqvbmi CGvebt4fi4DKa9XQlG7HZ3BYls6zsxi38K5J5rA+8p/7AaAijh/x4zO8oq8/lUjvrBCd gOKRs7li5BqC4sMpa4vKLSixgx7W3seEERdxI= Received: by 10.224.175.69 with SMTP id w5mr4572502qaz.13.1345054247441; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:47 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.229.38.21 with SMTP id z21ls2826107qcd.2.gmail; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.138.146 with SMTP id a18mr13932133qau.6.1345054247115; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.138.146 with SMTP id a18mr13932131qau.6.1345054247100; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmfepo103.cox.net (eastrmfepo103.cox.net. [68.230.241.215]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id mx24si685445qcb.3.2012.08.15.11.10.46; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.215 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.215; Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120815181046.HZAX8874.eastrmfepo103.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:10:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([70.187.237.100]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id n6Al1j00E2AfMYu016AlNR; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:10:46 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.502BE626.00CB,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VLlfbqzX c=1 sm=1 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=bCp1rMGN3pQA:10 a=xUU8x0Tk3bmSP1X8xL0A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10 a=MQZuvjT3xUZLKv0gclfWMg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <502BE623.7000802@lojban.org> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:10:43 -0400 From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] carna References: <201208140713.33133.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: <201208140713.33133.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.215 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Tuesday 14 August 2012 04:46:04 Jonathan Jones wrote: >> So, this has been going about for a bit. I'm sure most of you are already >> aware of it. >> >> Since this is the BPFK, I thought I'd see what the opinions of the people >> in charge of language changes etc. were. >> >> Specifically, what do the BPFK members think of doing the following: >> >> 1. Change the meaning of carna from "x1 turns/rotates/revolves around axis >> x2 in direction x3" to "x1 turns from x2 to x3" which has very little >> impact on usage thus far (all 144 instances of usage, that is). >> >> 2. Add two new gismu with the following meanings: >> >> word1: x1 is rotating counter-clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about >> rotational axis/axes (set if multiple) x3 >> word2: x1 is rotating clockwise viewed from orientation x2 about rotational >> axis/axes (set if multiple) x3 > > I would prefer to keep "carna" as it is, I agree. > specifying that x3 is stated according to the right-hand rule, That is one problem with "clockwise" and "counterclockwise" in that one becomes the other if you change hands. One does not need to explicitly specify right hand rule. That is probably the default, but it can be specified using BAI (probably ma'i). > and add a new gismu meaning "x1 turns from > x2 to x3", sounds like carna-klama (carkla) would meet that need. lojbab -- Bob LeChevalier lojbab@lojban.org www.lojban.org President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.