Received: from mail-qa0-f57.google.com ([209.85.216.57]:59095)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBDKM7JENRINRBR6FUGDAKGQETKEIZ4I@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Tijz4-0007Db-Li; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:56:25 -0800
Received: by mail-qa0-f57.google.com with SMTP id o13sf391572qaj.2
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:56:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=gsci5CBo0aCiUAgAYf9wmWMKMR+rAVM+p8C+mdNVtFM=;
        b=i28Mwy7n1Qcl8gs2FucwzM1KbjqFzx6tO1PKSVn3cWKav0T5qYeAvNjpyQToFFBL5c
         XG7V4bGoxA3FkBmDNBCPxdfZ/dKSU/zI2oO7CyWLUDCu9xt04jhn4/mH27/lTsdon3D5
         ZtvdXGEpH0Dkl6IndO3IEtKw5DDFvzNsPu3hJvFvbkVup2UaU4B5pc+WyN8uy+ylhw6f
         6G4A+97utF2PXy8qPY0xg5gP3VF72rKg0x21tmUQ9hfHOJCBXbS0/W/tejmDjXoDaOz7
         ubAw8hceWUV2R2CGnO/v7SMUhl8XbOWVyczomOQ/LkDj3ps3gfi2qpUWmuu1w3tMGfEM
         0z4A==
Received: by 10.49.87.1 with SMTP id t1mr222996qez.41.1355309768199;
        Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:56:08 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.127.174 with SMTP id nh14ls1019515qeb.28.gmail; Wed, 12 Dec
 2012 02:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.158.105 with SMTP id p69mr869872yhk.10.1355309766930;
        Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.158.105 with SMTP id p69mr869871yhk.10.1355309766919;
        Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chausie ([2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s78si2305999yhh.3.2012.12.12.02.56.06;
        Wed, 12 Dec 2012 02:56:06 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) client-ip=2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5;
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BE721842
	for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:56:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] polysemy of {nai}
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 05:56:05 -0500
Message-ID: <17159764.xTAaXnXW7h@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.5 (Linux/3.2.0-34-generic; KDE/4.8.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <b2895d02-f9c6-4cee-ae0f-e545eb3aecfe@googlegroups.com>
References: <95cdbee4-7ddc-4f7d-bb48-4591b7c3d915@googlegroups.com> <20121209025300.GF10989@mercury.ccil.org> <b2895d02-f9c6-4cee-ae0f-e545eb3aecfe@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com:
 2001:470:8:42:2c0:f0ff:fe3b:b5b5 is neither permitted nor denied by best
 guess record for domain of phma@bezitopo.org) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Sunday, December 09, 2012 04:07:48 la gleki wrote:
> 1. {lo zmiku cu na'e xendo} is a false statement. Robots can't be
> kind/unkind or in the middle of that scale. The scale just cannot be
> applied.
> 2. {lo zmiku cu na [ja'e] xendo}={lo zmiku cu na na'e xendo}={lo zmiku cu
> na to'e xendo} is a true statement. The scale is denied.

lo bifce be la .sfeks. zmiku so'i se tarti .i xu lo bifce be la .sfeks. xendo 
lo panzi be ri

Which brings up another question. Does "ri" refer to "lo bifce be la .sfeks." 
(which is what I meant) or "la .sfeks."? I think it refers to the last finished 
sumti which is not a personal pronoun, but these two sumti finish at the same 
point in text.

Pierre
-- 
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.