Received: from mail-qe0-f62.google.com ([209.85.128.62]:46166)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBDPLXXOJVIKBBLNH6WHAKGQEZAVKJWA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1UwtWf-00051a-It; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:30:01 -0700
Received: by mail-qe0-f62.google.com with SMTP id q19sf2083712qeb.27
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=x-beenthere:x-ct-class:x-ct-score:x-ct-refid:x-ct-spam
         :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:organization
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post
         :list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe
         :content-type;
        bh=Uj9qfXY0+VpoLj1t/D7mx3uni/fRKAfolArMsBLM+sU=;
        b=i32rLKf7oYzTUF55s3O35/y0yRpwtR4UGbdGGihgkgZCFO/PXIVnbQuByB7CtUxP/Z
         KKi429gt8jTIebhwPueZHquGQEYGh2nA2MzSiWM1E1EFtqkuLZSUNLGco3t8XPodAiCc
         yBt7+4nnDMg5VuqKFkP2W8WZCS1K+62Sym7e1llrTtJQ2rjCCo2On5iAvujeDH3AUA+M
         WIR+ajIbX9UzxPWIyWmnSDZT2gFYXV57RGiqwjN/jLMKRVPDiZ9jKo8G23YHk4xEDEbw
         rF0pt800w6BO6tTrSNktFbWqonj8cXbO8aDhik9RbFu4HSahMOrZaKJAk174TMdgSoGy
         LOEg==
X-Received: by 10.49.82.50 with SMTP id f18mr906120qey.22.1373459373968;
        Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.109.36 with SMTP id hp4ls2633204qeb.33.gmail; Wed, 10 Jul
 2013 05:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.236.124.78 with SMTP id w54mr16488188yhh.44.1373459373532;
        Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net (eastrmfepo203.cox.net. [68.230.241.218])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id c28si111648qck.1.2013.07.10.05.29.33
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>;
        Wed, 10 Jul 2013 05:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.241.218 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.241.218;
Received: from eastrmimpo109 ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP
          id <20130710122933.QGRT3853.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo109>
          for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29:33 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([72.209.248.61])
	by eastrmimpo109 with cox
	id ycVY1l0031LDWBL01cVYWA; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29:33 -0400
X-CT-Class: Clean
X-CT-Score: 0.00
X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.51DD53AD.004A,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0
X-CT-Spam: 0
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Dv2IDhD+ c=1 sm=1
 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=YsUzL_8ObRgA:10 a=ku_EBbUYtd8A:10
 a=xmHE3fpoGJwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=65N2Kk4KMgMA:10
 a=whjqdJISSrXK5b6XveUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=dxBpO5_FDU0A:10
 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <51DD53AB.6040705@lojban.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:29:31 -0400
From: "Bob LeChevalier, President and Founder - LLG" <lojbab@lojban.org>
Organization: The Logical Language Group, Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] mabla and zabna by fiat.
References: <yEiA1l00456Cr6M01EiB3A>
In-Reply-To: <yEiA1l00456Cr6M01EiB3A>
X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: 68.230.241.218 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess
 record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 1
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Does anyone mind if I simply declare
    xorxes' definitions correct for > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/mabla
   and > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/zabna ? It's what everyone uses > anyways,
    and I'm sick of this shit. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.1 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: lojban.org]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> Does anyone mind if I simply declare xorxes' definitions correct for
> http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/mabla and
> http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/zabna ?  It's what everyone uses
> anyways, and I'm sick of this shit.


I see no problem with the change (the other could be expressed as a 
lujvo, I believe), but the relevant baseline document is the gismu list, 
and not jbovlaste, so I would want to see a definition that fits that 
context.

Also, absent a formal change to the baseline, I would like a note added 
to the top of the gismu list indicating that the definition has changed, 
the date of change, and that Robin is doing do by byfy jatna fiat.

Of course, I am not sure where the baseline version of the gismu and 
cmavo lists currently reside.  Baseline documents should not be open to 
community editing, and I'm not sure what on the Lojban pages is and 
isn't editable.

lojbab

-- 
Bob LeChevalier    lojbab@lojban.org    www.lojban.org
President and Founder, The Logical Language Group, Inc.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.