Received: from mail-ve0-f185.google.com ([209.85.128.185]:61771) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WZ0kU-0001UI-Ig; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:26:04 -0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f185.google.com with SMTP id jw12sf1356103veb.2 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Ecs5rESGZJeFSEESELv6R97gNcreWYJ6b0Qv7kWxQw4=; b=AXXRLzDC66DynexQHgnq940wkcalH4zD9464ammNr0exzhT9ugcUQo7POBE/OsO5+w MTr4cVaOVWraAxPaYYYmoXV0VlJMfTMaJT2Umu7IMDP2zwrizjcXQB2qcyK9ZfiokVox MGp4tBGBikG1+pepqRPWL3yIXxgcI+aBolqiBW9WDr8VVcovod6Od86ggUsR0Zkwejno NoT+CHCSrUMoLTbEvVFERnECRmZ84kyweIyQdj83x5Dl1VJcctMG+TYHzhh9dLIpLyDQ txYOtP7YHSw0yvACTdOKD0LweD8D4zTlaL0uHsRoCwt8gdEao2pDbkwnvNzRkjt8RZTK uRpw== X-Received: by 10.50.176.227 with SMTP id cl3mr112502igc.11.1397319939914; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.25.70 with SMTP id a6ls974673igg.42.canary; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.42.115.129 with SMTP id k1mr13826750icq.25.1397319939590; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x22b.google.com (mail-ve0-x22b.google.com [2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fj1si2616696vdc.3.2014.04.12.09.25.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b; Received: by mail-ve0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id jy13so5918371veb.16 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.187.9 with SMTP id fo9mr25686265vec.4.1397319939485; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.170.73 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:25:39 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] The definition of cmavo. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6776c8a1750c04f6dae6ef X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / --047d7b6776c8a1750c04f6dae6ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > I suggest that cmavo2 is a la'e zo-quotation of a cmavo that represents > the whole selma'o ({lu'i}?) > > so > {zo a cmavo la'e zo a}. Otherwise we need a separate word for each selma'o > (like e.g. {cmavrxavo}). > Since {zo a} is easier to remember than {cmavrxavo} and since other usages > of cnmavo2 are unlikely to be useful i suggest changing (clarifying?) this > definition > > "la'e ko'a" usually gives you the meaning of ko'a rather than its class, so "la'e zo .a" is probably closer to "lo terma'o be zo .a" than to "lo selma'o be zo .a". If "lu'i ko'a" meant "the (obvious) set that has ko'a among its members" then you could use "lu'i zo .a". "lu'i ko'a" has usually been interpreted as "the (only) set that has ko'a as (all of) its members" though. The first definition is probably more useful, but it is also more vague. After all, the sets {".a", ".e", "ji", ".o", ".u"} and {".a", "be", "ci", "do", "fu"} both have ".a" among its members, so even with the relaxed definition you would have to rely on obviousness and context to know that "lu'i zo .a" meant selmaho A, and not for example that other set. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --047d7b6776c8a1750c04f6dae6ef Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Gleki Arxokuna = <gleki.i= s.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

I sugge= st that cmavo2 is a la'e zo-quotation of a cmavo that represents the wh= ole selma'o =A0({lu'i}?)

so=A0
{zo a cmavo la'e zo a}. Otherwise w= e need a separate word for each selma'o (like e.g. {cmavrxavo}).
Since {zo a} is easier to remember than {cmavrxavo} and since ot= her usages of cnmavo2 are unlikely to be useful i suggest changing (clarify= ing?) this definition


"la'e ko'a" usually gives you the meaning of k= o'a rather than its class, so "la'e zo .a" is probably cl= oser to "lo terma'o be zo .a" than to "lo selma'o be= zo .a".

If "lu'i ko'a" meant "the (obvio= us) set that has ko'a among its members" then you could use "= lu'i zo .a". "lu'i ko'a" has usually been interp= reted as "the (only) set that has ko'a as (all of) its members&quo= t; though. The first definition is probably more useful, but it is also mor= e vague. After all, the sets {".a", ".e", "ji"= ;, ".o", ".u"} and {".a", "be", &qu= ot;ci", "do", "fu"} both have ".a" among= its members, so even with the relaxed definition you would have to rely on= obviousness and context to know that "lu'i zo .a" meant selm= aho A, and not for example that other set.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--047d7b6776c8a1750c04f6dae6ef--