Received: from mail-vc0-f185.google.com ([209.85.220.185]:56658)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBCGJHDV3NEIOHCXOTMCRUBBP6OGKS@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Wmn5F-0007PF-Ny; Tue, 20 May 2014 09:40:31 -0700
Received: by mail-vc0-f185.google.com with SMTP id hu19sf183072vcb.12
        for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 20 May 2014 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :user-agent:sender:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=cSSaDRacxaP3mwO5xtZVcMVQNZGwOQRT6+zQolrTdG0=;
        b=Xw+eQHpHWuQXm2DeVB26aLzWDcJXK8ZDRetRvvuf3FpMQyDafINT7M1fOeIl0VPhBE
         tXEElizZ73lUjUDI99PMWFVNJfDHo9LH7QO+JPMUXAzvP4vtgJr8D+Z35oMl6hRNy8Y1
         sGUcm1igEkNdgNg5zkUIY1QKjJIf8AAWJaVXv/rlgSybbz7/dC4mtKOuOSTyFqNcxBrR
         5wHB/6VwAUchQfAwsiQ3l+I2byt1gA39PdXsPS3draQ7WvlJNkKRq0a8tnelZtJqnWLb
         AHmTVsyAJagfVpNIcKyrRVgoO9pUuVfP2lE/XxyVsi7YCPp30oe4iKZz9NjE1VWZd0Jd
         asOw==
X-Received: by 10.182.220.232 with SMTP id pz8mr74592obc.13.1400604003239;
        Tue, 20 May 2014 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.183.13.198 with SMTP id fa6ls93405obd.10.gmail; Tue, 20 May
 2014 09:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.118.162 with SMTP id kn2mr8108158obb.42.1400604002935;
        Tue, 20 May 2014 09:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org. [192.190.237.11])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ci7si330033qcb.1.2014.05.20.09.40.02
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 20 May 2014 09:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: cowan@ccil.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.190.237.11;
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>)
	id 1Wmn57-0006O4-UB
	for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Tue, 20 May 2014 12:40:02 -0400
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:40:01 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Vote proxying?
Message-ID: <20140520164001.GC9283@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <CACf3dPkGGTvibA89Q1epNdVQnqmggo4Gzw1py0pCxv=XAOFgpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACf3dPn8hwqc3biqYicTyjUFMaVZ0e2jOf5YeFOJ-084Bog+Ag@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACf3dPn8hwqc3biqYicTyjUFMaVZ0e2jOf5YeFOJ-084Bog+Ag@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: cowan@ccil.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: cowan@ccil.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=cowan@ccil.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

And Rosta scripsit:

> Is it legitimate to proxy one's vote on bpfk matters?

The LLG has traditionally accepted them, and the BPFK is a committee
of the LLG, formally speaking, so I see no reason why not.

John Cowan, LLG parliamentarian

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Rather than making ill-conceived suggestions for improvement based on
uninformed guesses about established conventions in a field of study with
which familiarity is limited, it is sometimes better to stick to merely
observing the usage and listening to the explanations offered, inserting
only questions as needed to fill in gaps in understanding. --Peter Constable

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.