Received: from mail-la0-f60.google.com ([209.85.215.60]:38369) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wp1Lv-0005Cf-CQ; Mon, 26 May 2014 13:18:50 -0700 Received: by mail-la0-f60.google.com with SMTP id pn19sf773705lab.15 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 13:18:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=w0LMBGrW39V4lD01XFE6oK9r+AVZF41hlj8R9BS0MWw=; b=lw1rwj4Uq4b8vleK3/MCSgmtw59L5LomsdPBVP8Y1DuREbkk+LSC4rPYUACvS2fNRw Z31d4E4AWScuRg+uT1AVftyPTpu1jX7dBlDu/PbASURUgNFJ9isEkHA9+q8qW5LNoE5q jew62GVIRGU+3N4FEdaXJzcwXDH1w7vQ0SD0fiG5tn8z712oVdSpw3glVLfrqzBG/JG5 kTBEX664GO9I6fXzqY5DJIuhwh2elRIwcKzjBSsq9OEttl9ghWSI/r2wtdOdWBJybHvi AE3Xho59xWZgfuVXwthq4XUBQuAp43dofQPdRTjLr1mEEhrvykyscRvkUTsdGGBUlsM5 otHQ== X-Received: by 10.152.18.134 with SMTP id w6mr231500lad.1.1401135507090; Mon, 26 May 2014 13:18:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.115.233 with SMTP id jr9ls501476lab.49.gmail; Mon, 26 May 2014 13:18:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.136.229 with SMTP id qd5mr10171lbb.21.1401135506794; Mon, 26 May 2014 13:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.15]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r49si4445774eep.0.2014.05.26.13.18.26 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 May 2014 13:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.15; Received: from [192.168.2.108] ([93.220.74.2]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDQUP-1X5EuV1YJZ-00GmgS for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 22:18:26 +0200 Message-ID: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 22:18:27 +0200 From: selpa'i User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:s1WldDn+m3H+xvNNr5Z6WHLyUWufjZw9ZLeWAZIz0yNdzmQfBQT x395F60wPQMdlvQ2HXfCoz7ryxh+TmdmxAAcpt1pXL1UtJGk0CHFj/4Xs1Z75m5E7vCqtNm AYTBD5J6nEKuubW/CnMJc6PmKyU4dS+nYPqjuOoAisE1heUXRY/jYEJfzU21fLucVSkcHYZ KGVLVI08BJJX2Pybpz8EA== X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.0 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / Hello ladies and gentlemen. So here's the deal. I'd be fine with finishing the entire thing on my own (though helpers are allowed :P ), it's a very easy but boring task, *but* I have a few comments first. Firstly, I find it weird that so many of the blue sections haven't been voted on even though blue indicates that a page is ready for a vote. Then again, many of the allegedly complete sections (marked blue) contain many mistakes. Should I care to fix every incorrect example sentence? What about strange statements in the notes? What about all the sections with irregular formatting that don't follow the standard format of a cmavo definition (as defined by the template)? Almost all of the time is spent on waiting for the tiki to update all those small formatting changes. If it weren't for that, I'd be able to define all the cmavo within a very short time (let's say 1 or 2 days). Secondly, there are some pages which have an ongoing vote, with four or five votes recorded which are several years old. The current BPFK has no actual members right now, as Robin not only called the BPFK dead, but also said that anyone could simply declare themselves a member (in other words, anyone is the BPFK) This means it's very hard to judge what the different votes are worth. Therefore, I would suggest declaring all previous votes null and void and to do a new, proper vote with members who are *currently* active in the community. So let's please pick new voting members (otherwise we don't know what constitutes a majority) and then vote on the blue sections. If there are problems in them, then people can vote no with an explanation of what's wrong. mi'e la selpa'i mu'o -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.