Received: from mail-la0-f56.google.com ([209.85.215.56]:38231)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBC65FOEL4UJRBKOKVCOAKGQE5755JHA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1WqoPQ-0005Ou-ST; Sat, 31 May 2014 11:53:49 -0700
Received: by mail-la0-f56.google.com with SMTP id mc6sf318852lab.11
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 31 May 2014 11:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=YYksZE0wSyHV+P/SuAkVc253vHOh2yBabmmtibXsq2s=;
        b=zC0BBgfYh2ddOhmaq4dBbk7kNwEROnOR3ThBR3Zk/XewqN7B9NLjFmbf4r/sM9xIR+
         FCudq9PInQ0mGImQjeTCvJWTPMimGdW9b3FPkLhZaI3DJ/q6LedyyygxarGwkG99Hor+
         a5VNUVoAaNFMGI/NchE2vKp1nkW0hrMXacyQFkEujuyp2iraXrQm7+0ViSSe69MIATsR
         EGs6abQUCusUoE23RodphRIiijZYIrgqPnsBfXNnR59xN94FQJ4m9lEymBM+GfYxNiSi
         fi0kvYI6snSkZ1ozl/+89qg6wmYsUw+omdVWxXRxMcz0fVxRztDFEOSN3BPc2IJTVjjL
         mkRw==
X-Received: by 10.180.89.231 with SMTP id br7mr8081wib.8.1401562409100;
        Sat, 31 May 2014 11:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.231.10 with SMTP id tc10ls226483wic.4.canary; Sat, 31 May
 2014 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.181.13.196 with SMTP id fa4mr388751wid.6.1401562408871;
        Sat, 31 May 2014 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.19])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r49si5342388eep.0.2014.05.31.11.53.28
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sat, 31 May 2014 11:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.19;
Received: from [192.168.2.108] ([93.220.115.89]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LqQnR-1WMRXV1wuX-00e1Nq for
 <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 31 May 2014 20:53:28 +0200
Message-ID: <538A252F.6060204@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 20:53:35 +0200
From: selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: [bpfk] BPFK section: TAhE (ta'e vs na'o)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0FGslDnlEeVf/RcL8GjsmBWexCNScz0NuJE+0UjqGxkdEUvnkqd
 jyUYy0Rh3LhbzqOdu+eS59c9JVYlfqFH6oOUKwsi4W62Dft1SsPWAZ2YukybZyt1dhzLU/m
 YvCKXcPgjFFEn5BMiRkqVnvyMbL1aaVHypds/U1UkJeLU9qzVeqWA0ITNGm+jYVcckymTW8
 0y91itl0h72s/d0yRdo7A==
X-Original-Sender: seladwa@gmx.de
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of seladwa@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.19 as permitted
 sender) smtp.mail=seladwa@gmx.de
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

The TAhE section is now more or less ready for voting. You can find it here:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Tense+Interval

I also added the following comment about {ta'e}:

"The sense of "habit" is commonly ignored in usage in favor of a more 
general word indicating that the event is common/normal/ordinary. 
Otherwise it would make little sense to use it for events that don't 
involve an agent. The difference between {ta'e}'s usage and the intended 
meaning of {na'o} is almost undistinguishable as things stand. Current 
usage has {ta'e} as {fi'o jai ze'a fadni} and {na'o} is almost never used."

It seems the distinction between {ta'e} and {na'o} has never been very 
clear. I remember some very old jboske threads about it.

This needs to be resolved.

mi'e la selpa'i mu'o

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.