Received: from mail-oa0-f63.google.com ([209.85.219.63]:49534) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wu68u-0004rr-NQ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:21 -0700 Received: by mail-oa0-f63.google.com with SMTP id i7sf400637oag.18 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=DaCkfybZQEV6j0oqwS6LkzyJEiBIhdIXGxcp5lWmamM=; b=YZPb+VI6XcZsf38Ytz+42gCH4evHeoT4chGojVFBkaygFNwSMSNJVY8xhqJmPvYy29 kH0uxZ5YAaSriPqnv8mjhVkZ1yMJMIJPcsuc7mXvVv41qywTr1CZECnsUz1ABWtlRAe2 hadn2HaZZKYpbJg0DeaIcrbfLf8h8HoT8ODzWTpDApNAvo62jbezOmk4TYvcTNKdo44V mxq9v9ACIoEvd7FtIFqcC1rWG1L0mYl2IlZq+KyynKhKMzoUSG2hnpn/bPzL4tknbAPm 3IAYeJz53dXdrTZMYWXlOxPzpFFwnzSchkLX0YHJ3Ie8k4onP8v1VWrkBF21jE7bA0J1 jUYQ== X-Received: by 10.50.73.196 with SMTP id n4mr347507igv.14.1402345562134; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:02 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.138.37 with SMTP id qn5ls540499igb.35.gmail; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.43.92.195 with SMTP id br3mr12643115icc.1.1402345561752; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qg0-x22d.google.com (mail-qg0-x22d.google.com [2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x7si4125747qcd.3.2014.06.09.13.26.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d; Received: by mail-qg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id z60so9445934qgd.32 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.239.4 with SMTP id ku4mr35816716qcb.17.1402345561596; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.39.200 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5383A193.3010907@gmx.de> <53847E05.1000107@gmx.de> <53850FBA.50309@gmx.de> <5385B1E2.4000409@gmx.de> <538740D9.8060703@gmx.de> <538A2528.8030404@gmx.de> <539610C0.2030303@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 14:26:01 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Finishing the BPFK sections From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11346b540d2ac004fb6d05bd X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11346b540d2ac004fb6d05bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 While having them grouped certainly cuts down on repetition, I believe Robin has plans to use the boxes for auto-generation type stuff, and having them all grouped together would probably complicate those plans. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Adam Lopresto wrote: > As a page, I think that format is just fine. But wasn't the plan for the > new definitions to be used in place of the existing ma'oste? If that's so, > then each would need its own definition, even if they're somewhat redundant. > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:53 PM, selpa'i wrote: > >> What do people think about sections like this one: >> >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Anaphoric+Pro-sumti >> >> Should each word get its own box or can it remain as it is? >> >> >> mi'e la selpa'i >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "BPFK" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11346b540d2ac004fb6d05bd Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
While having them grouped certainly cuts down on repetitio= n, I believe Robin has plans to use the boxes for auto-generation type stuf= f, and having them all grouped together would probably complicate those pla= ns.


On Mon,= Jun 9, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Adam Lopresto <adamlopresto@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
As a page, I think that for= mat is just fine. But wasn't the plan for the new definitions to be use= d in place of the existing ma'oste? If that's so, then each would n= eed its own definition, even if they're somewhat redundant.


On Mon, Jun 9= , 2014 at 2:53 PM, selpa'i <seladwa@gmx.de> wrote:
What do people think about sections like this one:

http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Anaphor= ic+Pro-sumti

Should each word get its own box or can it remain as it is?


mi'e la selpa'i

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
mu'o mi= 'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.l= uk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. = :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11346b540d2ac004fb6d05bd--