Received: from mail-oa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.219.64]:44386)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBCGJHDV3NEIPFGPDTQCRUBCBL7BWM@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1WuqGe-0004OS-LP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:41:28 -0700
Received: by mail-oa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id eb12sf56903oac.9
        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :user-agent:sender:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-disposition;
        bh=Rsl2sj+i/i42HwwBj0ea7j/aBYj7hzEFhGZVacnwnYE=;
        b=iXqoXjYyKLTf70Cx3EW1/gY7J1N5R2JXM+kNI1fKlM/xUz0GNmqO/itexoG2ioiq0q
         VrUaxuB4eOSJ6jilysKi+fyTQv+DK+gowrIo2lO8/NDkMIyx3Oq7Pb1XZIajZrkKqUfc
         cMC1B7rfeHVEoJCalKx/65Dyck2Q2j5Wu/0ImxqklaiY0t0e2e7O4+wqnbEit/n9JzlX
         blas3MJJH+rV1YVEA57x1c+rpKIlLQ77WSD4sxvkMvkRfua7K/z+bDZcBX5Eg/SIcGef
         SflglBRe1R0P3IQk/NUvUmKXpx6epR5Dss7bxb3h6UyckJuK1ecb4Bo5miWaWSZcIFaj
         PP8Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.96.161 with SMTP id k30mr54875qge.33.1402522866272;
        Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.140.51.132 with SMTP id u4ls2773955qga.36.gmail; Wed, 11 Jun
 2014 14:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.58.106.75 with SMTP id gs11mr1099632veb.18.1402522866015;
        Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org. [192.190.237.11])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x2si5751320qch.0.2014.06.11.14.41.05
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: cowan@ccil.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=192.190.237.11;
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>)
	id 1WuqGX-000133-E8
	for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:41:05 -0400
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:41:05 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BAhE + BU
Message-ID: <20140611214105.GC28473@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <d4bf0415-f7b6-4735-b6f1-dcebc0100386@googlegroups.com>
 <m2d2emxesx.fsf@brockman.se>
 <20140610152942.GA1582@mercury.ccil.org>
 <73581D93CF4542F0B52FDBDD7EB241C9@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <73581D93CF4542F0B52FDBDD7EB241C9@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: cowan@ccil.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=neutral
 (google.com: cowan@ccil.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=cowan@ccil.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-Spam_score: -2.6
X-Spam_score_int: -25
X-Spam_bar: --

Alex Burka scripsit:

> And the language in "Nonce connectives" should definitely be unified --
> either we say {ba'e} and {za'e} both "bind" with the following word,
> or neither of them do, plus the definition for {za'e} has points about
> {sa} and left-to-right magic word resolution that should be in both
> definitions assuming they are correct.

On reflection I was wrong to say ba'e is not at all magic; it is semi-magic
like UI and COI words.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
I now introduce Professor Smullyan, who will prove to you that either
he doesn't exist or you don't exist, but you won't know which.
                               --Melvin Fitting

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.