Received: from mail-lb0-f189.google.com ([209.85.217.189]:53513)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBCOZJTMR5YGRBWH6V6RAKGQE7RNKFXQ@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Xi7NY-0001d2-7l; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:52:08 -0700
Received: by mail-lb0-f189.google.com with SMTP id f15sf280003lbj.6
        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=KU5RBXmrHxLGQ7FOXrfZGFq3JMVlXff+6EAa7eGT5gM=;
        b=ByVqZXGwCYnAW/MywMQVacm3oQ71d+RVn4Mr+YrzFREVUSCTEtVUS/Y7EgZheiqN92
         0N9L2mOy6CDuLkb3tcXjOJfsgZoz9DTsUdxpKStd0JEa1EnQPZ5ICsr8P963WFxtVRpg
         8Uj1Csk5gNd6/FBKicMcIdxaY79KwmPs0/8R2UZPAPF7OI40zA6yshhZlOu0B6wtDU2g
         MjyMJDDUFvBUbEMQJ7AfipWHTCj2eEMQp07zrK+FEC0Gs6TszOu4lvtwPKe8raAWg/d8
         te7d0oOjnBsnRg6EGXOePYl79tI//+xazp5pSKpH5Qk0LHu2EqQtpkhh2XHSyyqJlrIk
         9B1g==
X-Received: by 10.180.9.163 with SMTP id a3mr37257wib.1.1414266712192;
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.97.40 with SMTP id dx8ls287380wib.28.canary; Sat, 25 Oct
 2014 12:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.242.36 with SMTP id wn4mr13366wjc.4.1414266711883;
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::229])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cy3si275837wib.2.2014.10.25.12.51.51
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::229;
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q5so3377448wiv.0
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.90.210 with SMTP id by18mr13540586wjb.34.1414266711792;
 Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.105.201 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 12:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <544BF508.3060500@gmail.com>
References: <33A9DB5129C54FFF85FCDD708B6909D8@gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2e9Ukj2MaEm-Xr9-dAenOM7wX4fSm1Ci8BKg-QSchswRQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<9c2066d4-8da6-48ec-9cfb-63f79ca42187@googlegroups.com>
	<CAO7tK2fJeQQUrvgo1MzP_XNMhk2or3c6yTERwvdREjM9F9uCKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2eN1oc0JQyr0Rd6ESy-Giq7RW0UbMNRQfXs6K6MD-9fow@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141025153624.GA1727@mercury.ccil.org>
	<CAO7tK2c3huhqOQa25rKojYUszJGre5DCrmHwCABkC0sH_cH8NQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<544BF508.3060500@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:51:51 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2cHP0V5VjaEzeb7yyd5NyBakznudWyGh41fUycDnDPVPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com;       dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com;       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcf662f961d8050644a0f1
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

--047d7bfcf662f961d8050644a0f1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:07 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> But if Lojban syllabification is essentially CV (or simplex onset +
> simplex nucleus), give or take any complications with glides, why bother
> with a bunch of morphophonological constraints? Is it just because they are
> codified in CLL (albeit in erroneously phonological terms) and therefore
> cannotbe abandoned?  Would abandoning morphophonological constraints
> invalidate existing words or text?
>

Abandoning the constraints against double consonants, voiced-unvoiced
clusters, sibilant-sibilant clusters, x-c/k clusters and mz would not
invalidate anything, as far as I can tell. The distinction between valid
and invalid "onsets" is mostly what is needed to delimit words.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--047d7bfcf662f961d8050644a0f1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:07 PM, And Rosta <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hre=
f=3D"mailto:and.rosta@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">and.rosta@gmail.com</a>&=
gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 =
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
But if Lojban syllabification is essentially CV (or simplex onset + simplex=
 nucleus), give or take any complications with glides, why bother with a bu=
nch of morphophonological constraints? Is it just because they are codified=
 in CLL (albeit in erroneously phonological terms) and therefore cannotbe a=
bandoned?=C2=A0 Would abandoning morphophonological constraints invalidate =
existing words or text?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Abandoning the =
constraints against double consonants, voiced-unvoiced clusters, sibilant-s=
ibilant clusters, x-c/k clusters and mz would not invalidate anything, as f=
ar as I can tell. The distinction between valid and invalid &quot;onsets&qu=
ot; is mostly what is needed to delimit words.</div><div><br></div><div>mu&=
#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes=C2=A0</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--047d7bfcf662f961d8050644a0f1--