Received: from mail-wi0-f192.google.com ([209.85.212.192]:48547) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XiL99-0007GM-5P; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:34:11 -0700 Received: by mail-wi0-f192.google.com with SMTP id z2sf296997wiv.19 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=14L8zZwhr8Eyt6of/0EG1kimHH04lKWa2i1pc8trDG0=; b=L0TV+HfV04tdqCappE+Q2m5YpWWf9G9eO8sZy03U6SndQ9mbO4dZ3p9x0bof0SfS/O Jh6ZH99HCx2ZkmEjspwzYXBjFB2rEeSGGmNRiwBbHQFilq35n68y8hkjXhA60srXeh5d FTmnxd7L/cfcvWLs9SF8JxuclO5dwMPOtXqPyCo8qus+VEVlYaOE7vh5oHdJzYEJ8bo6 9eNcvUz9Wg6XGSSBUXgWIx4jJ51ybkDbdHqobNEHRnolfRJ3zEHhtsmx5HDZbQYRJjbp NpryTP95vXG0xD+tZw5L03Q2uryvv74Uz2O/muBKEimi+VtkhmhYJS6M/byb0IkJ6k/w c3xA== X-Received: by 10.180.90.51 with SMTP id bt19mr44153wib.19.1414319635671; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.206.17 with SMTP id lk17ls110574wic.45.gmail; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.58.47 with SMTP id n15mr1025341wjq.0.1414319635304; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ej8si335784wib.3.2014.10.26.03.33.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a; Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n3so3990723wiv.3 for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.235.132 with SMTP id um4mr1189042wjc.91.1414319635146; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.103.65 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 03:33:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <33A9DB5129C54FFF85FCDD708B6909D8@gmail.com> <9c2066d4-8da6-48ec-9cfb-63f79ca42187@googlegroups.com> <20141025153624.GA1727@mercury.ccil.org> <544BF508.3060500@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:33:55 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] camxes and syllabification in zi'evla From: Gleki Arxokuna To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01419f5073b2db050650f39e X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e01419f5073b2db050650f39e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-10-25 23:51 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > > > On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:07 PM, And Rosta wrote: > >> >> But if Lojban syllabification is essentially CV (or simplex onset + >> simplex nucleus), give or take any complications with glides, why bother >> with a bunch of morphophonological constraints? Is it just because they = are >> codified in CLL (albeit in erroneously phonological terms) and therefore >> cannotbe abandoned? Would abandoning morphophonological constraints >> invalidate existing words or text? >> > > Abandoning the constraints against double consonants, voiced-unvoiced > clusters, sibilant-sibilant clusters, x-c/k clusters and mz would not > invalidate anything, as far as I can tell. > For them an autocorrection might be implemented in parsers that would automatically insert {y} between them. > The distinction between valid and invalid "onsets" is mostly what is > needed to delimit words. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e01419f5073b2db050650f39e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-10-25 23:51 GMT+04:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.co= m>:


On= Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 4:07 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

But if Lojban syllabification is essentially CV (or simplex onset + simplex= nucleus), give or take any complications with glides, why bother with a bu= nch of morphophonological constraints? Is it just because they are codified= in CLL (albeit in erroneously phonological terms) and therefore cannotbe a= bandoned?=C2=A0 Would abandoning morphophonological constraints invalidate = existing words or text?

Abandoni= ng the constraints against double consonants, voiced-unvoiced clusters, sib= ilant-sibilant clusters, x-c/k clusters and mz would not invalidate anythin= g, as far as I can tell.
For them = an autocorrection might be implemented in parsers that would automatically = insert {y} between them.
=C2=A0
<= div> The distinction between valid and invalid "onsets" is mostly= what is needed to delimit words.

mu'o mi'e xorxes=C2=A0
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e01419f5073b2db050650f39e--