Received: from mail-wg0-f60.google.com ([74.125.82.60]:60447) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xks33-000597-7p; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:22 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f60.google.com with SMTP id k14sf789461wgh.25 for ; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=eIPnesx6cvcdvKPJQoK+NCHANTgWMloPJNuQ8pRMLtc=; b=MsQemAwIz0J225vCsWuthVojJJSPo2qCzHX+owoUFWtEeYA4UFiQkkUxPe15UlPmuX shkXE/lziOnM02vq5a5ClvYY7d1ZO1HpTIsEJCyJx5m92fGPJASmtVb3NGl2iMBi8eLh N8Ajt7WH8jkuwOo4CT6HGGQYBmm4V9u8lPABFkCR0L68rHziJUCTV0OMhH8z9jyWSjda J0tRA/fOa/FiGKeTTT3XuWL7WcKfiduDxYS2UFi7jliuJubfOkqFqVVb2atVehhk+jn/ n5KhOxkZvO9GnsZR0mT/1twAZ4z6AwuAx5p7xWkV4arbCWeFIqYpbNviB9gYvMWMMuQo 8HLg== X-Received: by 10.180.78.99 with SMTP id a3mr20937wix.12.1414922765627; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.231.4 with SMTP id tc4ls308621wic.34.gmail; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.219.40 with SMTP id pl8mr1548745wic.3.1414922765365; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l9si165703wix.1.2014.11.02.02.06.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b; Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id y10so6253032wgg.2 for ; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.9.33 with SMTP id w1mr9008747wia.22.1414922765225; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.103.65 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Nov 2014 02:06:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 13:06:05 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: [bpfk] make {lr} dispreferred From: Gleki Arxokuna To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2406cce794e0506dd6010 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c2406cce794e0506dd6010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A. {lr} can pose problems for some when pronouncing them. B. {karli} vs. {kalri} can be an annoying point of confusion C. =E6=97=A5 is lojbanized as "ri" in {solri} and =E5=AD=A6=E4=B9=A0 is loj= banized as "ci" in {cilre}. both can be disputed. D. {lr} got into {cilre} by lojbanizing "learn" as "lrn" which i can't call a perfect lojbanization from pragmatic viewpoint So i humbly suggest obsoletizing this cluster. It affects 7 gismu: solri, molro, kalri, jilra, jalra, cilre, balre possible solutions of obsoletizing them can be: 1a. replacing {l} or {r} to something else allowing both pronunciations with the {lr} pronunciation marked as "dispreferred". E.g. {*cilne} and {cilre} with the second dispreferred. Definitely, cilre (word No. 142) and solri (word No. 818 in my frequency list based on IRC logs) can't be just removed from the language so tagging them as "dispreferred" is the only possible solution. 1b. alternatively find a new form given fact D. above. {*lerne} would do fine. 2. {jalra} has a broken definition. {blato} covering termites and cockroaches would do fine with {.ortoptera} for Orthoptera. 3. As for lujvo {lr} would be always assumed as =3D{lyr}. just for the info i'm not sure if {rl} poses that many problems but the following gismu have it: tarla, surla, sarlu, perli, mirli, merli, kerlo, karli, farlu, darlu, cirla --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c2406cce794e0506dd6010 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A. {lr} can pose problems for some when pronouncing them.<= div>B. {karli} vs. {kalri} can be an annoying point of confusion
= C. =E6=97=A5 is lojbanized as "ri" in {solri} and =E5=AD=A6=E4=B9= =A0 is lojbanized as "ci" in {cilre}. both can be disputed.
=
D.=C2=A0{lr} got into {cilre} by lojbanizing "learn" as &quo= t;lrn" which i can't call a perfect lojbanization from pragmatic v= iewpoint

So i humbly suggest obsoletizing this clust= er.

It affects 7 gismu:
solri, molro, kalri, j= ilra, jalra, cilre, balre

possible solutions o= f obsoletizing them can be:
1a. replacing {l} or {r} to something= else allowing both pronunciations with the {lr} pronunciation marked as &q= uot;dispreferred". E.g. {*cilne} and {cilre} with the second disprefer= red.=C2=A0Definitely, cilre (word No. 142) and solri (word No. 818 in my fr= equency list based on IRC logs) can't be just removed from the language= so tagging them as "dispreferred" is the only possible solution.=
1b. alternatively find a new form given fact D. above. {*lerne} = would do fine.
2. {jalra} has a broken definition. {blato} coveri= ng termites and cockroaches would do fine with {.ortoptera} for Orthoptera.=
3. As for lujvo {lr} would be always assumed as =3D{lyr}.
<= div>
just for the info i'm not sure if {rl} poses that ma= ny problems but the following gismu have it:
tarla, surla, sarlu,= perli, mirli, merli, kerlo, karli, farlu, darlu, cirla

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c2406cce794e0506dd6010--