Received: from mail-wi0-f183.google.com ([209.85.212.183]:50806) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpk1F-0002ZB-By; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:32 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f183.google.com with SMTP id hi2sf274797wib.20 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=IbBZ0c6NT0aToSL0HFDwM458iJz5EGqXixtSPO+b00Y=; b=E1hr0HzWhbqVLim/mphlVcGoHW8aeBEihE7I1tmWoidGKAx2fxFhBkkhn/LvJ/VEL4 GrrwAWa9c2KNtFxB5k8AUuVl/WSP+hebM3Qzrn03EcXCg0VHyKiUjGN4zZcVUwK/IUiX sEVYc4uq0c3n1UvmlcEkg1cnSFKUu+F6G1VT0y3fKQ0xzrLuQCraDpuAYJ+vvsQrnHrY 0eyBV5piy4lH64rJLnnvjXE+k9nZ33Hk4F74YBgLnyi5dZsH8KPiqYgJclwkw9rd1PO4 3N3CYuy3ZsjFyNhWFAXl0gzzv1m4PDO98wQ7HmUrULyP7PwbzchrXsgnbQrC8sokMUc6 v0pA== X-Received: by 10.180.82.133 with SMTP id i5mr71671wiy.11.1416083542566; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.181.11.170 with SMTP id ej10ls543202wid.15.canary; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.219.40 with SMTP id pl8mr2513530wic.3.1416083542256; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sg7si1576558lbb.1.2014.11.15.12.32.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a; Received: by mail-la0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id s18so2783667lam.29 for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.21.9 with SMTP id r9mr3824324lae.76.1416083542122; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.70.111 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:32:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0ECDA8252DB74B6A924A302A02D55629@gmail.com> <2B42884AD9984C369994567E68611980@gmail.com> <5676AB4A25B640DEB6EE877F655D9D77@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:32:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d20248028dd0507eba4eb X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --089e013d20248028dd0507eba4eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > What about checking for validity by humans? > The brivla rafsi rule for humans is quite simple: Every valid brivla has an extended brivla rafsi that consist of the full brivla followed by 'y. The rule for fu'ivla rafsi is also simple in principle: drop the final vowel and replace it with y (just as with gismu), but the hitch here is that not every fu'ivla has this shorter rafsi available. If the the result of replacing the final vowel with y is a string of ordinary rafsi, then the fu'ivla doesn't have a fu'ivla rafsi. So for example "spageti" doesn't have the shorter rafsi "spagety-" because this is a string of ordinary rafsi spa-get-y. So it only has the extended brivla rafsi "spageti'y-". "spagetytai" is not "spageti zei tarmi", it's "spati zei gento zei tarmi". Also, fu'ivla that end in a diphthong or in apostrophe vowel don't have this shorter rafsi available. > Humans wont be able to determine the validity of the resulting brivla on > the fly if they use these numerous rules. > The rules are of course quite messy, but they are learnable by humans. cant something more simple be proposed (may be at the expense of losing > some already valid brivla and/or allowing more forms) ? > It depends on how much you're willing to throw away. If we were to throw away the whole rafsi system and start afresh, then the rules could be made much more simple. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e013d20248028dd0507eba4eb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <<= a href=3D"mailto:gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gleki.is.my.= name@gmail.com> wrote:
What about checking for validity by humans?
=

The brivla rafsi rule for humans is quite simple: Every= valid brivla has an extended brivla rafsi that consist of the full brivla = followed by 'y.

The rule for fu'ivla rafsi= is also simple in principle: drop the final vowel and replace it with y (j= ust as with gismu), but the hitch here is that not every fu'ivla has th= is shorter rafsi available. If the the result of replacing the final vowel = with y is a string of ordinary rafsi, then the fu'ivla doesn't have= a fu'ivla rafsi. So for example "spageti" doesn't have t= he shorter rafsi "spagety-" because this is a string of ordinary = rafsi spa-get-y. So it only has the extended brivla rafsi "spageti'= ;y-". "spagetytai" is not "spageti zei tarmi", it&= #39;s "spati zei gento zei tarmi". Also, fu'ivla that end in = a diphthong or in apostrophe vowel don't have this shorter rafsi availa= ble.
=C2=A0
=
Humans wont be able to determine the validity of the resulting brivla = on the fly if they use these numerous rules.
<= br>
The rules are of course quite messy, but they are learnable b= y humans.=C2=A0

cant something more simple be proposed (may be at the ex= pense of losing some already valid brivla and/or allowing more forms) ?

It depends on how much you&#= 39;re willing to throw away. If we were to throw away the whole rafsi syste= m and start afresh, then the rules could be made much more simple.=C2=A0

mu'o mi'e xorxes

<= /div>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e013d20248028dd0507eba4eb--