Received: from mail-wi0-f189.google.com ([209.85.212.189]:53543) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XpxuG-0001ay-V9; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:17 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f189.google.com with SMTP id r20sf9921wiv.26 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=SJGh9k5lKgaAN0/n+lpHT/KpsJXYoDJPsnk4n4f5xVc=; b=fzipPp5d0e3BNeitt7GA5XdOrdDkwbYkilMyLoAa0k4cofjko4QrNB8ee6VFZPsWaK afI+KJ866h8mHFjnFyvtr9dNQ1tm4g1Vu2224/MvQZz+OWktShXO25h0qebdpevtl3eI lzcd2mgZtGJIw2unnlPpkdodlUQDNYVFoCFtkUcppnrFYCu1WmVz53BAG3GpgOdbM3fp 67XbzNkKbOhIGyo4dTz2z0mweIPl3UreyAV39KbCU3LVTmTp1TRpkhto0zJ85XTni7GB oFbQGv2m9l5z5M4WLUQHRBYcPQCW533CEGxVp8P0exhnhrwZlAu1YJQjdhuXCDpdnRg7 HISQ== X-Received: by 10.152.87.205 with SMTP id ba13mr593970lab.5.1416136926314; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:06 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.43.129 with SMTP id w1ls1031483lal.34.gmail; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.10.233 with SMTP id l9mr4729919lab.0.1416136925383; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jj5si299099lbc.0.2014.11.16.03.22.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::229; Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 10so14713967lbg.14 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.206.11 with SMTP id lk11mr19770804lac.42.1416136925271; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.70.111 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 03:22:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0ECDA8252DB74B6A924A302A02D55629@gmail.com> <2B42884AD9984C369994567E68611980@gmail.com> <5676AB4A25B640DEB6EE877F655D9D77@gmail.com> <5467EDB6.6010304@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 08:22:05 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11349392625d480507f812b2 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11349392625d480507f812b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > 2014-11-16 4:37 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > >> >> brivla <- !cmevla !cmavo !h &onset unstressed-syllable* >> stressed-syllable unstressed &post-word >> >> Yes, that's what i wanted. I dont care about the rafsi structure of > brivla. Let them remain in peg. > I'm not sure what you mean. If the rafsi structure remains, then this simplified rule won't work. This rule is for a reformed language, it is not a rule that merely hides the rafsi structure. I just want to explain to noobs how to detect valid brivla. > If a slinkuhi test needed then it's needed. > The slinku'i test is about rafsi structure. You also have to consider valid forms such as ".eslinku'i" which would break down into two words without the slinku'i test. I'm also not against {kibpapri} since it'd be automatically assumed to be > expanded into {kibypapri}. va'i I can explain banning voiceless-voiced > clusters in a separate rule. > "kibpapri" will be rejected by the phonotactics, but that's not the only function of "y". Compare "bratyrapli" with "bratrapli" for example. One is "bratu zei rapli", the other is "barda zei tarti zei pilno". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11349392625d480507f812b2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name= @gmail.com> wrote:
2014-11-16 4:37 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <= ;jjllambias@gmail= .com>:

=C2= =A0 brivla <- !cmevla !cmavo !h &onset unstressed-syllable* stressed= -syllable unstressed &post-word

<= /blockquote>
Yes, that's what i wanted. I dont care abo= ut the rafsi structure of brivla. Let them remain in peg.
=

I'm not sure what you mean. If t= he rafsi structure remains, then this simplified rule won't work. This = rule is for a reformed language, it is not a rule that merely hides the raf= si structure.

<= div>I just want to explain to noobs =C2=A0how to detect valid brivla.
=
If a slinkuhi test needed then it's needed.

The slinku'i test is about rafsi stru= cture. You also have to consider valid forms such as ".eslinku'i&q= uot; which would break down into two words without the slinku'i test.= =C2=A0

=
I'm also not= against {kibpapri} since it'd be automatically assumed to be expanded = into {kibypapri}. va'i I can explain banning voiceless-voiced clusters = in a separate rule.

"kibpapri" will be rejected by the phonotactics, but that's = not the only function of "y". Compare "bratyrapli" with= "bratrapli" for example. One is "bratu zei rapli", the= other is "barda zei tarti zei pilno".

m= u'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11349392625d480507f812b2--