Received: from mail-wg0-f63.google.com ([74.125.82.63]:46525) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XqTdl-0001C7-AI; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:19 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f63.google.com with SMTP id x12sf1683668wgg.18 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=YhpSZ1pRqt55ZcTRaNsxlFnWwB1IMXCKF8dERoz4mzE=; b=KzDOXdawpkLCSTkERkBzqS22cTH2ZbdSl61878fJLPEFe9cpTZBz949+9hcHdSpNOi 13oI6nDhOG8bwkaYvkHtd8S96Fc26XbIIRBjy6JnDBwUT3dX45ZBY8st49BlbaVP3Qqj AKqx3Z7MGQQRwasEX3SuV133uIn+JmTBPMi8URQMl5mY9c3DaIzFbLKDz9UDf4sNbsuG H7bZox4JG9nAQi6gz2oUUSgfpnSx+FIgeNuVrYidHMs3y0DzuYMfzRFATmu3HT0cgvcn bFq/eiMdPSNea1eK/8dOs8KAhNSnwdPIPofazE9VT2UZ84qA7cA0Jg+4PZLVgHb4GizL ou3Q== X-Received: by 10.180.75.46 with SMTP id z14mr125363wiv.16.1416258910183; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:10 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.93.130 with SMTP id cu2ls399484wib.43.gmail; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.176.106 with SMTP id ch10mr9837wjc.6.1416258909920; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lb0-x231.google.com (mail-lb0-x231.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c04::231]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sg7si2096350lbb.1.2014.11.17.13.15.09 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::231 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c04::231; Received: by mail-lb0-x231.google.com with SMTP id z12so9602436lbi.8 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.234.201 with SMTP id ug9mr31315667lbc.14.1416258909799; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.70.111 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <2B42884AD9984C369994567E68611980@gmail.com> <5676AB4A25B640DEB6EE877F655D9D77@gmail.com> <5467EDB6.6010304@gmx.de> <20141116202004.GK13604@mercury.ccil.org> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 18:15:09 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] extended rafsi and a tosmabru/slinku'i boondoggle From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c04::231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3c8323a8ccf0508147917 X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c3c8323a8ccf0508147917 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > btw, my question was not about throwing away rafsi but instead to get an > easy way of determining whether a given word is a valid one. > > Determining which class it belongs to is another question that is solved > by the full peg now. > With the current system, determining whether a given word is valid is tantamount to determining which class it belongs to. > My question was "can an ordinary human without a computer detect a word as > being valid/invalid?" if yes then what would be 'eir steps to determine > that. > Of course we can. The rules are somewhat baroque, but by no means impossible to apply. You probably already know how to detect valid cmevla, cmavo and lujvo. The last case, fu'ivla, you get by a process of elimination: if the candidate is a valid string of syllables with penultimate stress, it's not a cmevla, it's not a gismu or lujvo, it doesn't begin with a cmavo that can fall off leaving valid lojban words, and it passes the slinku'i test, then it's a valid fu'ivla. It's perfectly possible for humans to check all of that without the help of a computer. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c3c8323a8ccf0508147917 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <<= a href=3D"mailto:gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gleki.is.my.= name@gmail.com> wrote:

btw, my question was not about throwing= away rafsi but instead to get an easy way of determining whether a given w= ord is a valid one.

Determining which class it bel= ongs to is another question that is solved by the full peg now.
=

With the current system, deter= mining whether a given word is valid is tantamount to determining which cla= ss it belongs to.=C2=A0
=C2=A0
My question was "can an ordinary human without a computer detect a = word as being valid/invalid?" if yes then what would be 'eir steps= to determine that.

Of course we can. The rules are somewhat baroque, but by no means impossib= le to apply. You probably already know how to detect valid cmevla, cmavo an= d lujvo. The last case, fu'ivla, you get by a process of elimination: i= f the candidate is a valid string of syllables with penultimate stress, it&= #39;s not a cmevla, it's not a gismu or lujvo, it doesn't begin wit= h a cmavo that can fall off leaving valid lojban words, and it passes the s= linku'i test, then it's a valid fu'ivla. It's perfectly pos= sible for humans to check all of that without the help of a computer.=

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c3c8323a8ccf0508147917--