Received: from mail-wg0-f62.google.com ([74.125.82.62]:58533) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XrvoC-00060i-Gn; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:32:06 -0800 Received: by mail-wg0-f62.google.com with SMTP id l18sf507643wgh.17 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=fHwMfDOS+FERWy4eltMYjWNF2qEqjH+FY8Ib3GrFDGI=; b=Y7jxeDxxOqGhDAROa1jG121v1MyPtTSS5TIYcOuGXJcro/xBYKf8yc00tKW2nWgzFH LQxePmWaJ0MAlcIlb/kcAiEWhs+0PXor0LYjxuoVYq6OZYriPjdD6kvFEcnp6HjK/Pi9 swUOE+oVCmX5u6ra/MF1pkD6ZuNA8fLUXewCgavZjZHwpeIsqpyOSNXjRG81+8iBbEmG XYBmN+4whgNQH7eywEZMZD7nT+ZmbJji9OBF7XyDVjortvXiI+6DrdwCwaKXb0gzHKUB k0UGckmzzeJcZGE2cbRQPMMHd81FuDvMABNdDNuTcvP+niEDKe6wp29AiRe31gpWqjS6 6QcA== X-Received: by 10.180.149.135 with SMTP id ua7mr3336wib.17.1416605517804; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.181.13.237 with SMTP id fb13ls31880wid.17.gmail; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.8.9 with SMTP id n9mr136895wia.6.1416605517537; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sg7si782277lbb.1.2014.11.21.13.31.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::233 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::233; Received: by mail-la0-x233.google.com with SMTP id mc6so4932042lab.24 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.173.100 with SMTP id bj4mr7817541lbc.78.1416605517411; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.70.111 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:31:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <407A8993FE744C7FB7AA19EDAB90EE87@gmail.com> References: <407A8993FE744C7FB7AA19EDAB90EE87@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:31:57 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] {e'i} in usage and in the wiki From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c24066a6fa830508652cbe X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c24066a6fa830508652cbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > Er, how is this not redundant to {.ei}? {.ei mi cliva} is what I've always > said for that example. > They are similar, yes. The main difference is that with ".e'i" the speaker is the source of authority, whereas with ".ei" it's just how the speaker feels things ought to be. With first person actions the difference can be very subtle, but with second or third person it's more clear: "ei" is "this ought to happen", whereas ".e'i" is "let this happen, make this happen". "ei gusni" "there ought to be light (but there's nothing I can do about it)" "e'i gusni" "let there be light (I command that it be so)". mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c24066a6fa830508652cbe Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>= wrote:
Er, how is this not redundant to {.ei}? {.ei mi cliva}= is what I've always said for that example.

=
They are similar, yes. The main difference is that with ".e= 'i" the speaker is the source of authority, whereas with ".ei= " it's just how the speaker feels things ought to be. With first p= erson actions the difference can be very subtle, but with second or third p= erson it's more clear: "ei" is "this ought to happen&quo= t;, whereas ".e'i" is "let this happen, make this happen= ". "ei gusni" "there ought to be light (but there's= nothing I can do about it)" "e'i gusni" "let there= be light (I command that it be so)".

mu'= o mi'e xorxes
=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c24066a6fa830508652cbe--