Received: from mail-lb0-f183.google.com ([209.85.217.183]:60110) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1XsT3O-0007Sh-Tr; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:02:01 -0800 Received: by mail-lb0-f183.google.com with SMTP id p9sf525728lbv.10 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=hwsBd8OfvATlgbyzydcWO00wyCpenp+Q/hlAeKuxO3c=; b=FKh8nLoyDzAkuwHwoUN11Tl7NOb3cM9HUy9k4ZWkQ62bgGlUpCd6xlFskkIjBQXVqB 5E+onhhzBPUTbKz8rPVytNa7E3EkEDYecCylYN2nc8/W8ot5EVH9QuZ7F4okvUO93yUd 9yAu97SnKJvj9XS7MRbSzDOWCBphPbxYz4njSMIfy1nCciO7XZTTGoAAmYhhxon2KnZ4 mDrspV8gHGdJe1Vw9w/DU4Q/wjjLyg/+G1LNt0hYWsNb1BLZB2tRq5mKG2cIJoBF+zXS gpXYXTqCSVtxq3ogf2Uhd5AOho2ViW9zQpZSx6ukLV0SmcuQfy7DzAcQXma/qLEG0iTc HA9w== X-Received: by 10.152.5.3 with SMTP id o3mr252lao.18.1416733311457; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:51 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.42.170 with SMTP id p10ls345253lal.35.gmail; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.5.2 with SMTP id o2mr925332lao.1.1416733310674; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4si236661wif.2.2014.11.23.01.01.50 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b; Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id bs8so2933262wib.16 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.208.69 with SMTP id mc5mr11959280wic.25.1416733310522; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.87.229 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2014 01:01:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <407A8993FE744C7FB7AA19EDAB90EE87@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:01:50 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] {e'i} in usage and in the wiki From: Gleki Arxokuna To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36d78b71bcd050882ed49 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --001a11c36d78b71bcd050882ed49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014-11-22 19:33 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas : > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Gleki Arxokuna < > gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Usage tells that: >> ei mi cliva - conventions/rules dictate that I leave. >> e'i mi cliva - the situation forces me to leave. >> ei is a UI for {sei mi te javni}. >> e'i is a UI for {sei mi bilga}. >> > > That would mean "e'i" can only be used with "mi" as agent > oops, sorry. the two my definitions of {e'i} contradict each other. Let me try once again: ei mi cliva - conventions/rules dictate that I leave. e'i mi cliva - the situation forces me to leave. ei =3D sei [lo nu no'a cu] se javni e'i =3D sei [lo nu no'a cu] se bapli [be lo nau tcini] by [lo nu no'a] I mean the event of the bridi in which the sei-clause is inserted. , but I see a lot of usage of these words with sentences where "mi" is not > the agent. Some random examples for ".e'i" from korpora zei sisku: > Do you think they reflect the meaning that you suggest for {e'i}? E.g. this is how I understand them (recurring examples are not translated): do sanga .e'i =3D It has to be so that you sing. .i mi do viska sei .e'i do terpa =3D ? .au .ei .e'i do cilre fi lo cnima'o =3D It should and has to be so that you learn about cnima'o, and I wish it was so. .i .e'i lo xekri cu kelci .i .e'i zo_cu .e nai zo_xu co'e .uinai .e'i do toljundi mi .i lo te pilno .e lo te xamgu cu .e'i se setca .i ku'i .e'i mi'o denpa =3D We have to wait .e'i ko ta mi dunda =3D It has to be so that you wait so wait! I can agree with And that "to have to" might not be an illocutionary thing but rather a modal but then how can these examples be understood otherwise? > > >> So my question is why e'i was moved from {ei} group into {e'V} group >> turning it into kinda imperative marker. >> > > I don't think it was moved as such. CLL doesn't even give an example with > ".e'i", so it's not very clear that it wasn't in the e'V group from the > start. Since you can use ".e'i" for a first person imperative anyway, it > just makes sense to define it as a regular member of the e'V group. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11c36d78b71bcd050882ed49 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2014-11-22 19:33 GMT+03:00 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas <jjllambias@gmail.co= m>:

<= br>
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:3= 7 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> w= rote:

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
Usage tells that:
ei mi cliva - co= nventions/rules dictate that I leave.
e'i mi cliva - the situ= ation forces me to leave.
ei is a UI for {sei mi te javni}.
=
e'i is a UI for {sei mi bilga}.

That would mean "e'i" can only b= e used with "mi" as agent

oops, sorry. the two my definitions of {e'i} contradic= t each other.
Let me try once again:
ei mi cliva -= conventions/rules dictate that I leave.
e'i mi cliva - the s= ituation forces me to leave.

ei =3D sei [lo = nu no'a cu] se javni
e'i =3D sei [lo nu no'a cu] se b= apli [be lo nau tcini]

by [lo nu no'a] I mean = the event of the bridi in which the sei-clause is inserted.

<= /div>

, but I see a lot of usage of these words with se= ntences where "mi" is not the agent. Some random examples for &qu= ot;.e'i" from korpora zei sisku:

Do you think they reflect the meaning that you sugge= st for {e'i}?
E.g. this is how I understand them (recurring e= xamples are not translated):


do san= ga .e'i =C2=A0=3D It = has to be so that you sing.

.i mi do viska sei .e'i do terpa =3D ?

.au = .ei .e'i do cilre fi lo cnima'o =3D It s= hould and has to be so that you learn about cnima'o, and I wish it was = so.

.i = .e'i lo xekri = cu kelci

.i .e'i zo_c= u .e nai zo_xu co'e

.uinai .e'i do toljundi mi

.i lo te pilno .e lo= te xamgu cu .e'i se setca
=C2=A0
.i ku'i .e= 9;i mi'o denpa =3D We= have to wait

.e'i ko ta mi dunda =3D It has to be so that you wait so = wait!

I can agree with And that "to have to&q= uot; might not be an illocutionary thing but rather a modal but then how ca= n these examples be understood otherwise?
=C2=A0



=C2=A0
=C2=A0
So my question is why e'i was moved from {ei} group into {e&#= 39;V} group turning it into kinda imperative marker.

I don't think it was moved as = such. CLL doesn't even give an example with ".e'i", so it= 's not very clear that it wasn't in the e'V group from the star= t. Since you can use ".e'i" for a first person imperative any= way, it just makes sense to define it as a regular member of the e'V gr= oup.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11c36d78b71bcd050882ed49--