Received: from mail-ie0-f185.google.com ([209.85.223.185]:53233) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz6dj-0001Ox-BP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:58 -0800 Received: by mail-ie0-f185.google.com with SMTP id rp18sf731806iec.2 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=qzXq8XJ22ttbqST/JiOrs5I6tVD3NWhjiW+oT9HaXhA=; b=tUdOOEAzJ2H67Jdz06EH1Ci8TsZmFSCfN6sIh+YlPTZTtPMzVxhVwMBDWocqsyMdQM 88cag1EMieDtbfwFzv0WfbyNfuaeJ+Qec+f4XQTwCLK2vqa1RoirCSuOaVGROVx8H65Z Wfi3Fg++ilgomfI/AQb4MmCX9sQxSHUYLOOcoWUvEl3xdVNCRx64LehxpqtO8iY3+wJd elY+t2JxstksnTSEVLqOloyjzphIWT2vosoO/RAST/4uMiqu8IXwK2neF21MzXxD9MT7 pve7B+ZOZ0HugHbD/R65jgZKsdYKYAzRFaC71TYxV5Ktxy+c0v5KdVa+Z6bl7/VKELPF KlsA== X-Received: by 10.50.55.70 with SMTP id q6mr296729igp.11.1418315449435; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:49 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.143.98 with SMTP id sd2ls883211igb.31.gmail; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:49 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.111.131 with SMTP id ii3mr32550482igb.6.1418315449106; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fox.seas.upenn.edu (foxv6.seas.upenn.edu. [2607:f470:8:64:5ea5::e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id o8si131454qca.1.2014.12.11.08.30.49 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of aburka@seas.upenn.edu designates 2607:f470:8:64:5ea5::e as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f470:8:64:5ea5::e; Received: from [158.130.105.58] (SEAS313.wlan.seas.upenn.edu [158.130.105.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by fox.seas.upenn.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBBGUmkk020276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:30:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:30:48 -0500 From: Alex Burka To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-ID: <37B9332186E84669A81F0F30709F2B48@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <5444FEBF.10200@gmx.de> <544507CD.9050608@gmail.com> <20141021000349.GM14499@mercury.ccil.org> <54461EDB.70808@gmail.com> <54490F94.60609@lojban.org> <27825508-120d-421d-beb7-498fa858f673@googlegroups.com> <20141211131615.GF5272@mercury.ccil.org> Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form X-Mailer: sparrow 1.6.4 (build 1178) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5489c6b8_57ce66b4_c3a6" X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5400 definitions=5800 signatures=585085 X-PP-Spam-Details: rule=add_spam_details policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1111160001 definitions=main-1412110161 X-Original-Sender: aburka@seas.upenn.edu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of aburka@seas.upenn.edu designates 2607:f470:8:64:5ea5::e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=aburka@seas.upenn.edu Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --5489c6b8_57ce66b4_c3a6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline The preprocessor thing doesn't make a ton of sense to me. Does anyone else = support this "dialectal variation"? We don't preprocess {ie} to {i'e}, so I= don't see the point in changing ?{jie} to {ji'e}. They're quite different = sounds, and moreover different syllable counts, so you'll be complecting th= e stress and word segmentation rules as well as breaking audiovisual isomor= phism.=20 As for the larger question, I don't have a very strong opinion. I lean towa= rds consistency (that would be banning it or allowing it everywhere). If we= do allow it, maybe the sibilants should still be an exception for ease of = pronunciation (I don't have trouble with ?{guaspi}, but ?{jiespi} and ?{cia= spi} are difficult). So if we're approval-voting: 1.1.2 + 2. But I'm open to being convinced oth= erwise. mu'o mi'e la durkavore=20 On Thursday, December 11, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: >=20 >=20 > 2014-12-11 16:16 GMT+03:00 John Cowan : > > Gleki Arxokuna scripsit: > >=20 > > > I vote for this. + I prefer it to be just a synonym (dialect variatio= n of > > > the same sequence but with a {'} inside. co'o zo guaspi > >=20 > > I can live with this, but I'd prefer to ban it altogether. >=20 > It depends on in what way should it be banned.=20 > I vote for banning it from the formal grammar however, I vote for the pre= processor to be able to autocorrect {jie} back to {ji'e}. Speech recognitio= n must be able to recognize both variants. >=20 > >=20 > > -- > > John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org (m= ailto:cowan@ccil.org) > > Clear? Huh! Why a four-year-old child could understand this report. > > Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head or tail > > out of it. --Rufus T. Firefly on government reports > >=20 > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou= ps "BPFK" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send = an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:bpfk-list%2Bunsu= bscribe@googlegroups.com). > > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com (mailto= :bpfk-list@googlegroups.com). > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups= "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an= email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com (mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscr= ibe@googlegroups.com). > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com (mailto:b= pfk-list@googlegroups.com). > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --5489c6b8_57ce66b4_c3a6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
The preprocessor thing doesn't make a ton of sense to m= e. Does anyone else support this "dialectal variation"? We don't preprocess= {ie} to {i'e}, so I don't see the point in changing ?{jie} to {ji'e}. They= 're quite different sounds, and moreover different syllable counts, so you'= ll be complecting the stress and word segmentation rules as well as breakin= g audiovisual isomorphism.

As for the larger question, I don= 't have a very strong opinion. I lean towards consistency (that would be ba= nning it or allowing it everywhere). If we do allow it, maybe the sibilants= should still be an exception for ease of pronunciation (I don't have troub= le with ?{guaspi}, but ?{jiespi} and ?{ciaspi} are difficult).
So if we're approval-voting: 1.1.2 + 2. But I'm open to being = convinced otherwise.

mu'o mi'e la durkavore
=20

On Thursday, December 11, 2014= at 8:41 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote:



2014= -12-11 16:16 GMT+03:00 John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>:
Gleki Arxokuna scripsit:

> I vote for this. + I prefer it to be just a synonym (dialect variation= of
> the same sequence but with a {'} inside. co'o zo guaspi

I can live with this, but I'd prefer to ban it altogether.
=

It depends on in what way should it be ban= ned. 
I vote for banning it from the formal grammar however,= I vote for the preprocessor to be able to autocorrect {jie} back to {ji'e}= . Speech recognition must be able to recognize both variants.

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan    &nbs= p;   cowan@ccil.org
Clear?  Huh!  Why a four-year-old child could understand t= his report.
Run out and find me a four-year-old child.  I can't make head or tail<= br> out of it.        --Rufus T. Firefly on government repo= rts

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-li= st+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
=20 =20 =20 =20
=20

=20

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--5489c6b8_57ce66b4_c3a6--