Received: from mail-vc0-f188.google.com ([209.85.220.188]:50471)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBDPLXXOJVIKBBH4HXCSAKGQEAOX6LPA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Y0GtK-00012I-EW; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:39:52 -0800
Received: by mail-vc0-f188.google.com with SMTP id id10sf1477231vcb.15
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:39:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=r5PwiKipWpxBePgfFnKAtJ0vLWoZDADC/Hvtj2Ck0Ow=;
        b=AaWkR3cjNGMUoULLx+218KeaFVLZNt2ioTzgjL2nxM/8zwM/6Jus6t1DDS4tZU/4WV
         LreHKkJj7A0LrLIgEJGECBVRnt8jEPPdN+lo2gakgsU3WBx1PIsmduWE7twCO6zutrNm
         NSaMvtY9pbUtGo3BX/dBCvBRA0dhcGDQ0sBm1dSSFovS5U5ObBb/0NcNRa9kunwHf7If
         vqTKUmNFbIJYlR85FN4XmT0SBBE7zCYX2LU6/zcuiT7UxfMP0elz832KsNpC46datexR
         dPivLyNv9imv5BIi4hJDwOiPmREA7UWi75GAqvJYXDLBIBkSIZ22Pbw+mOHpc1M3RtcA
         KstA==
X-Received: by 10.182.28.36 with SMTP id y4mr16896obg.14.1418593184002;
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:39:44 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.182.20.98 with SMTP id m2ls866914obe.88.gmail; Sun, 14 Dec
 2014 13:39:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.79.70 with SMTP id h6mr23981990obx.43.1418593183750;
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net (eastrmfepo203.cox.net. [68.230.241.218])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7si1080880qcf.2.2014.12.14.13.39.43
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>;
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: none (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=68.230.241.218;
Received: from eastrmimpo306 ([68.230.241.238]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP
          id <20141214213943.PRQX27051.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo306>
          for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:39:43 -0500
Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.248.61])
	by eastrmimpo306 with cox
	id TZfY1p0041LDWBL01ZfY0z; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:39:43 -0500
X-CT-Class: Clean
X-CT-Score: 0.00
X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.548E03A5.0416,ss=1,re=0.001,fgs=0
X-CT-Spam: 0
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Z8gy6gtA c=1 sm=1
 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:17 a=BGi6d-X4uLYA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=0j6Abf_xJ_3f_qAiGN8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
 a=z9jnGXjs1dxvEuWvIXKNSw==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <548E0394.8080204@lojban.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:39:32 -0500
From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form
References: <f9d06e26-31b2-43ac-897e-b3a21db84dad@googlegroups.com> <5444FEBF.10200@gmx.de> <544507CD.9050608@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2cbz0jk8iax6TcQA3jLFrgoGT-SyoA_ebsJTap0hVOgoA@mail.gmail.com> <CACf3dP=MVcAydpRv1LMog=btQnv29EhLYtvc_PqBOHGDB-h7oA@mail.gmail.com> <20141021000349.GM14499@mercury.ccil.org> <54461EDB.70808@gmail.com> <54490F94.60609@lojban.org> <CAMKwHj2tMEK3Cnt-AFDK_mHWKKRwqxmbeBkMaMSaYbWtSUUgWw@mail.gmail.com> <27825508-120d-421d-beb7-498fa858f673@googlegroups.com> <CAO7bV+iuNpSyoJCDmn4=nE7dv7bTKj3do5pr1ykmnqu3wkYBJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO7bV+gyj0t=r4bEVgH1mVV1G54HNKnmqw37FCfakrKe+M6zpA@mail.gmail.com> <b3b7d9e9-570d-474a-88f0-a05dd5c1f1c8@googlegroups.com> <548AC3CB.7090403@gmx.de> <CACf3dPmTjTFDu6XSizag0N_-in_tqPjz-K4qhhhPBh2hpbAnTg@mail.gmail.com> <580B9AB84B34485AB4139B921C46CF42@gmail.com> <CACf3dPmuHy-wJDBhd=LKT3MscWiUW9S_+WH6H7Lrat-aY-YPQw@mail.gmail.com> <3ED463A548E74A53BD8F2ECEF0C620F8@gmail.com> <14FDADF47D7841A39D612894E81CC89B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <14FDADF47D7841A39D612894E81CC89B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=none
 (google.com: lojbab@lojban.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

On 12/12/2014 6:27 PM, Alex Burka wrote:
> I just realized you were probably using square brackets for IPA. So if I
> understand correctly (relying on a Wikipedia chart here) [tuwitsku]
> would be {tu uitsku}, gliding from the [u] to the [i], and [tu=CA=94itsku=
] is
> {tu .itsku} with a pause/glottal stop in between. As I understand it
> Lojban is of the opinion that [tuitsku] is indistinguishable from
> [tuwitsku].
>
> However, the debated ?{tuitsku} is pronounced [twitsku].
>
> mu'o mi'e la durkavore
>
> On Friday, December 12, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Alex Burka wrote:
>
>> I'm confused. {tuuitsku} breaks up into {tu uitsku}, no matter what we
>> do, but if CgV is disallowed then ?{tuitsku} would be invalid. The
>> separated words would be {tu .itsku} with the required pause.
>>
>> I apologize in advance if I'm still talking past you and answering a
>> different question that what you asked.
>>
>> mu'o mi'e la durkavore
>>
>> On Friday, December 12, 2014 at 2:16 PM, And Rosta wrote:
>>
>>> I meant what Lojban word(s).
>>>
>>> If [tuisku] is something other than {tuisku}, e.g. {tu uisku}, then
>>> {tuisku} should be illicit; otherwise it should be licit.


I have not been following this discussion, and defer to Cowan if he=20
disagrees with anything I say, but my recollection is that we permitted=20
"glides" to be WRITTEN in fu'ivla, but that they were considered to the=20
equivalent of the same string with a close-comma between the two=20
letters, so that tuitsku would be the same word as tu,itsku

lojbab

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.