Received: from mail-wg0-f63.google.com ([74.125.82.63]:60775)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncBDNZFNNFVAHRBN5VXCSAKGQEUXBFONY@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1Y0IQg-0001iW-Tz; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:24 -0800
Received: by mail-wg0-f63.google.com with SMTP id b13sf860684wgh.18
        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results
         :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help
         :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe;
        bh=d6pSYYc2lfAOnMawqYWo+Qz6PoW0jZMBUQchx7rvh5o=;
        b=VNSbk9lLD2R7l3APqt1J/ktJYriSDTvy3DB6mc5lB0mthJLblXLRY6woGsLBdA9w2J
         8tu9y9Z+k7dicbZqhCxfBaOrfZAm1plG9sc9oDWiSpl99LZ1U7dcCrVl1EiItf8wZcGf
         BYT0f5Y0kj5k3pub3D7Nx+BtpgEzK0KzP31HUP0m6g/3UR9WBKZYImhaJAXVzu18ieGZ
         QwpT0yEjCZSFajjvgHEGWhTw4dKz7cmZ8J3PfGmBfXYzo3HnJABMd7y1AAGuNmCTBO4n
         2TWuNCOXtWxmxfJ4RSXrxtcPgrQBceR+qa6Qz/1cnWgAvYueq1k2ymuUu94pcAd4mpMI
         tckQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.7.136 with SMTP id j8mr92012wia.16.1418599095806;
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.180.103.1 with SMTP id fs1ls570505wib.23.canary; Sun, 14 Dec
 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.180.7.226 with SMTP id m2mr1635119wia.5.1418599095484;
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com. [2a00:1450:4010:c03::235])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mu9si722411lbc.0.2014.12.14.15.18.15
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::235 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:4010:c03::235;
Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id gm9so8344480lab.40
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.120.42 with SMTP id kz10mr27480112lab.92.1418599095387;
 Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.70.212 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.70.212 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141214190350.GD29313@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <b3b7d9e9-570d-474a-88f0-a05dd5c1f1c8@googlegroups.com>
	<548AC3CB.7090403@gmx.de>
	<CACf3dPmTjTFDu6XSizag0N_-in_tqPjz-K4qhhhPBh2hpbAnTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<580B9AB84B34485AB4139B921C46CF42@gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPmuHy-wJDBhd=LKT3MscWiUW9S_+WH6H7Lrat-aY-YPQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3ED463A548E74A53BD8F2ECEF0C620F8@gmail.com>
	<14FDADF47D7841A39D612894E81CC89B@gmail.com>
	<CACf3dPnh34=k0Ea78Aej+T9SUak4OdB=M-OcL5DY+1xLiPN9ow@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141214025736.GB19927@mercury.ccil.org>
	<CACf3dP=rO4GXPpKuAW22ZtZ9T0rt4drQGn1JucojB_moP9BZhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141214190350.GD29313@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:18:15 +0000
Message-ID: <CACf3dPkhW5upoj+wXWbdVqovhZw2FtG2xcUcBkmJ4dP-rRjBBA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form
From: And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122839a28ca63050a3557e3
X-Original-Sender: and.rosta@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=pass
 (google.com: domain of and.rosta@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4010:c03::235
 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=and.rosta@gmail.com;       dkim=pass
 header.i=@gmail.com;       dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

--089e0122839a28ca63050a3557e3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 14 Dec 2014 19:03, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
>
> And Rosta scripsit:
> > Otherwise, the failure of [tuitsku] to realize any word constitutes an
> > arbitrary prohibition, and it is in the nature of arbitrary prohibitions
> > that there is a need to liberalize them.
>
> As arbitrary prohibitions go, this is nothing compared to the limitations
> on initial CCs.

If I were actually casting my vote, instead of proxying it to xorxes on the
grounds of his sounder judgement, I'd vote to liberalize those initial
clusters too. (And it would even not invalidate any prior usage.)

--And.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--089e0122839a28ca63050a3557e3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p dir="ltr"><br>
On 14 Dec 2014 19:03, &quot;John Cowan&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:cowan@mercury.ccil.org">cowan@mercury.ccil.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; And Rosta scripsit:<br>
&gt; &gt; Otherwise, the failure of [tuitsku] to realize any word constitutes an<br>
&gt; &gt; arbitrary prohibition, and it is in the nature of arbitrary prohibitions<br>
&gt; &gt; that there is a need to liberalize them.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; As arbitrary prohibitions go, this is nothing compared to the limitations<br>
&gt; on initial CCs.</p>
<p dir="ltr">If I were actually casting my vote, instead of proxying it to xorxes on the grounds of his sounder judgement, I&#39;d vote to liberalize those initial clusters too. (And it would even not invalidate any prior usage.)</p>
<p dir="ltr">--And.</p>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to <a href="mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href="mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href="https://groups.google.com/d/optout">https://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--089e0122839a28ca63050a3557e3--