Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cowan@ccil.org designates 192.190.237.11 as permitted sender) client-ip=192.190.237.11;
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:53:11 -0500
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form
Message-ID: <20141220185311.GF22447@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <CAO7tK2emCtHOCBQBtgDWuGx70vnBotX0Cbq9WCstcp7scx6=dQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACf3dPkzzbPCTTMvkhywgU2KVOHbuFcDH_SHWxnXpUK2tXhZnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5660b66f-68e1-4e9c-b4ce-1713a7bf1491@googlegroups.com>
 <CACf3dPnCyyKUaedusZTLVO3Oza-hao=USjysQS0YtKFwh5kizA@mail.gmail.com>
 <b15591f9-6745-49af-83c6-445550017c90@googlegroups.com>
 <7317B43184D74BC1B4767AA54F8988EA@gmail.com>
 <a1a15cc7-5f8f-4131-978c-c7ee693801f3@googlegroups.com>
 <CAO7tK2cM0iv8uWY2Hu3GPPxqx93k_y2i8psjJe-ig=USS--Qeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141220161147.GD22447@mercury.ccil.org>
 <CAO7tK2epetE+NrniYdQgv-zzTQ-J082xx_mNbOTouiA0+u7A1A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2epetE+NrniYdQgv-zzTQ-J082xx_mNbOTouiA0+u7A1A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas scripsit:

> To me allowing "iibroda" while rejecting "iibro da" doesn't make a lot of
> sense. It shouldn't be a matter of word class, we either allow the syllab=
le
> "ii" or we don't. Also, if "ii" is an attitudinal, "ii'a" could be one as
> well.

I agree that neither "iibroda" nor "iibro da" makes sense.  I continue
to believe that ".ii" and ".uu" should be treated as anomalous cmavo
(in the same way that "zkzkzkkzkzt" is an anomalous cmevla), and
that "ii" and "uu" should be disallowed otherwise.

> If the words "ii" and "uu" are to be treated as complete anomalies, then
> the camxes morphology may need to be rethought. It might then make sense =
to
> allow syllables without onsets, treat ia, ie, io, iu as bisyllabic, and
> allow ae, ao, ea, eo, eu, oa, oe, ou as well.

That's backward toward Loglan.  We introduced /h/ precisely to escape from
all that.

--=20
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
H=C3=ADggledy-p=C3=ACggledy / XML programmers
Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes;
Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is
Unicode weenies and / Fran=C3=A7ois Yergeaus.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.