Received: from mail-la0-f55.google.com ([209.85.215.55]:46212) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Y7OVQ-0002Uy-EZ; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:39 -0800 Received: by mail-la0-f55.google.com with SMTP id q1sf1895070lam.20; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=pAKsC+NpGwKeJdMe0v+NDPzMbo1vY5dRUxMQsEDmutY=; b=EGy24uqIfT7FnnE4Wxra4ayeaSAII4daNAVMVtffefYqGK1P6/2bwGOaShRUJ68Akt Vp01MU/dc6rTbgqFh7PIFzJBD6O+IBPJoYGsVPc8GPTJb3dLzHlvBKjHm6O5m0pXfAe2 4nHeneWamnRVzyDVqfOOYmVe4gzoADnBH/BfTfqWZa78Kc8wNNxCwPT9+lj+xdpYJ41k bMRaSZ0FEQFrdbONA/COZF8Ui/tA/onVREHqMP3pYi/RwsroaTtQp/eL0+945Nh0X61F CVV98XEX/MOXvuuX9K+gooN9BSLhNBigyXwVu1W1ai0s+Gr+kwhouMjyYDcQzIu/aWpZ G+9g== X-Received: by 10.180.82.163 with SMTP id j3mr21964wiy.4.1420290748969; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.180.97.66 with SMTP id dy2ls89332wib.44.gmail; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.7.226 with SMTP id m2mr371350wia.5.1420290748611; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id by17si133579wib.3.2015.01.03.05.12.28 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d; Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r20so810143wiv.12 for ; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.76.239 with SMTP id n15mr6949820wiw.66.1420290748515; Sat, 03 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.204.139 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 05:12:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54A703B0.5000209@gmail.com> References: <5660b66f-68e1-4e9c-b4ce-1713a7bf1491@googlegroups.com> <7317B43184D74BC1B4767AA54F8988EA@gmail.com> <20141220015319.GA22447@mercury.ccil.org> <9d32b667-8feb-45c9-97e2-f6ea0a771947@googlegroups.com> <9901a84c-7aea-4359-9cf7-df54606c3c8f@googlegroups.com> <54A703B0.5000209@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:12:28 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043749b38b0b96050bbf35e5 X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d043749b38b0b96050bbf35e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:46 PM, And Rosta wrote: > Under what circumstances is {'} omissible? > It is phonetic/phonological omission, or only orthographic omission? > As an orthographic omission, I think it could be omissible in all contexts except in: a'i, e'i, o'i, a'u, y'y, .i'V, .u'V, Vi'V, Vu'V. The omission would have to be done from left to right though, so for example if you have "bi'i'a", you could omit the first apostrophe and write "bii'a" but now you can't omit the second one, or you could leave the first one in, omit the second one and write "bi'ia", but you can't now go back and omit the first one even though it looks like an omissible context, because "biia" is "bi,ia" without any apostrophes. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d043749b38b0b96050bbf35e5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:46 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
Under what circumstances= is {'} omissible?
It is phonetic/phonological omission, or only orthographic=C2=A0 omission?<= br>

As an orthographic omission, I think it= could be omissible in all contexts except in: a'i, e'i, o'i, a= 'u, y'y, .i'V, .u'V, Vi'V, Vu'V.

The omission would have to be done from left to right though, so for= example if you have "bi'i'a", you could omit the first a= postrophe and write "bii'a" but now you can't omit the se= cond one, or you could leave the first one in, omit the second one and writ= e "bi'ia", but you can't now go back and omit the first o= ne even though it looks like an omissible context, because "biia"= is "bi,ia" without any apostrophes.

mu&= #39;o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d043749b38b0b96050bbf35e5--