Received-SPF: none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=107.14.166.230;
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 02:34:27 -0500
Message-ID: <1605733.CVuPAarOUL@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-43-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAO7tK2fJoTdqwQqRF7xHe0E+DFRu26B29e9CSsABc2u4UWBQVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACf3dP=rO4GXPpKuAW22ZtZ9T0rt4drQGn1JucojB_moP9BZhg@mail.gmail.com> <B1BEED3F0D9842528558A5E977F470F9@gmail.com> <CAO7tK2fJoTdqwQqRF7xHe0E+DFRu26B29e9CSsABc2u4UWBQVw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Friday, January 02, 2015 17:24:45 Jorge Llambías wrote:
    > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
    > > Shall we still allow {tuitr} and {nitcion} as zifcme? > > The vote said
    no cmevla, so... Those can become tuuitr/tu'itr, > nitciion/nitci'on, piier/pi'er,
    buuenosaires/bu'enosaires, etc. With cmevla > both methods always work. [...]
    
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [209.85.213.55 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders

On Friday, January 02, 2015 17:24:45 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu> wrote:
> > Shall we still allow {tuitr} and {nitcion} as zifcme?
>=20
> The vote said no cmevla, so... Those can become tuuitr/tu'itr,
> nitciion/nitci'on, piier/pi'er, buuenosaires/bu'enosaires, etc. With cmev=
la
> both methods always work.

I am sorry I missed this whole discussion. I had gotten into the habit of=
=20
clicking on the main list and beginners, but there was nothing in the BPFK=
=20
list for over a month so I got out of the habit of clicking on it.

Which do you think is better: "piier" or "pi'er"?

Pierre
--=20
La sal en el mar es m=C3=A1s que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.