Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::229;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CACf3dPnUL8Y0maqxyw_kvtuH9HmY-VU=N0gqsO3=tcLyuvSSVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACf3dP=rO4GXPpKuAW22ZtZ9T0rt4drQGn1JucojB_moP9BZhg@mail.gmail.com>
	<B1BEED3F0D9842528558A5E977F470F9@gmail.com>
	<CAO7tK2fJoTdqwQqRF7xHe0E+DFRu26B29e9CSsABc2u4UWBQVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1605733.CVuPAarOUL@caracal>
	<54B66490.6070406@gmx.de>
	<CACf3dPnUL8Y0maqxyw_kvtuH9HmY-VU=N0gqsO3=tcLyuvSSVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:14:29 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2fwgdTD=0HQU-Mb1CEafboDWWWbNvQ1Wy5zUymxTeZnnw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cc90b8367e36050ca41071
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: 0.8
X-Spam_score_int: 8
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
 
 Content preview:  On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>
    wrote: > I suggest that <tuitr, nitcion, pier, buenosaires> be deemed, by
    a general > rule that I am not competent to formulate, orthographic variants
    of > <tuuitr, nitciion, piier, buuenosaires> . > [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: googlegroups.com]
  2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL    RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org
                             [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org.	IN]
                             [A]
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3      RBL: Good reputation (+3)
                             [209.85.217.190 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                             domains are different
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (jjllambias[at]gmail.com)
  0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED   No valid author signature, adsp_override is
                             CUSTOM_MED
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and
                             EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL      Mailspike good senders

--14dae9cc90b8367e36050ca41071
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com> wrote:

> I suggest that <tuitr, nitcion, pier, buenosaires> be deemed, by a general
> rule that I am not competent to formulate, orthographic variants of
> <tuuitr, nitciion, piier, buuenosaires> .
>

The rule would be simple: CiiV <-> CiV; CuuV <-> CuV.

One could also require for aesthetic reasons that the ii or uu be within a
single word, although this is not strictly necessary from the point of view
of unambiguity.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--14dae9cc90b8367e36050ca41071
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, And Rosta <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:and.rosta@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">and.rosta@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>=
I suggest that &lt;tuitr, nitcion, pier, buenosaires&gt; be deemed, by a ge=
neral rule that I am not competent to formulate,=C2=A0orthographic variants=
 of &lt;tuuitr, nitciion, piier, buuenosaires&gt; .</div></div></blockquote=
><div><br></div><div>The rule would be simple: CiiV &lt;-&gt; CiV; CuuV &lt=
;-&gt; CuV.</div><div><br></div><div>One could also require for aesthetic r=
easons that the ii or uu be within a single word, although this is not stri=
ctly necessary from the point of view of unambiguity.</div><div><br></div><=
div>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--14dae9cc90b8367e36050ca41071--