Received: from mail-wi0-f185.google.com ([209.85.212.185]:37329) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YBWK0-00082P-DN; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:56 -0800 Received: by mail-wi0-f185.google.com with SMTP id fb4sf444283wid.2; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=7jb1mni/24ZXUoJeSMB6I5ZK/Tf8ojL9i+5xqfdcKo4=; b=f9Be492L9zAKu4i8L4Vga+tfIdbfgKGZZcX6qA0n4LI91tlJuzwjXv+YembKSvPjis ifPwOmF2ahbNsayQFyIN/ehv2CdTM/ixjInm96t0p2Op0DVEcFWNpj3xdPyIM0Mu8wgg MH2Lk5B5Qhn6MsBUWrKTrktdWG/2gAteWw/Ef91po1mntMNSrjK6JjYufTqVSm2qRNwv 23h4tIrkZ05664WdfWlgfpe+Sdq7gjSA5IdWmEdn53+H09rxhqFzo6Bq3pDJiHBKNLSn J+BeeUzHMHXAHXt1QhJTjmjUzMrIIAHWGTtjWA/vDHtOGQt07fbdphpy+kBE+ezU9HKK Zk2w== X-Received: by 10.152.37.98 with SMTP id x2mr3225laj.40.1421274103927; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.18.134 with SMTP id w6ls166787lad.63.gmail; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.44.225 with SMTP id h1mr812877lam.2.1421274103434; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d18si952848wiv.0.2015.01.14.14.21.43 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f; Received: by mail-wg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n12so11618585wgh.6 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.103.201 with SMTP id fy9mr55215750wib.31.1421274103311; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.204.139 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:21:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1605733.CVuPAarOUL@caracal> <54B66490.6070406@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:21:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] official cmavo form From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9cc90b80e7869050ca42a8a X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > Only within cmevla, right? Otherwise you'd be able to write "tuitsku" and > get two words. > "tuitsku" would indeed unambiguously represent two words "tu" followed by "uitsku". That's why I said that for aesthetic reasons one could also require that the ii or uu be fully within the same word. (I should also say that the V has to be a vowel, not a glide.) [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: upenn.edu] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jjllambias[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different --14dae9cc90b80e7869050ca42a8a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Alex Burka wrote: > Only within cmevla, right? Otherwise you'd be able to write "tuitsku" an= d > get two words. > "tuitsku" would indeed unambiguously represent two words "tu" followed by "uitsku". That's why I said that for aesthetic reasons one could also require that the ii or uu be fully within the same word. (I should also say that the V has to be a vowel, not a glide.) mu'o mi'e xorxes On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, And Rosta wrote: > > I suggest that be deemed, by a genera= l > rule that I am not competent to formulate, orthographic variants of > . > > > The rule would be simple: CiiV <-> CiV; CuuV <-> CuV. > > One could also require for aesthetic reasons that the ii or uu be within = a > single word, although this is not strictly necessary from the point of vi= ew > of unambiguity. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --14dae9cc90b80e7869050ca42a8a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Alex Burka <aburka@seas.upenn.edu= > wrote:
Only within cmevla, right? Otherwise you'd be able = to write "tuitsku" and get two words.

=
"tuitsku" would indeed unambiguously represent two wor= ds "tu" followed by "uitsku". That's why I said tha= t for aesthetic reasons one could also require that the ii or uu be fully = =C2=A0within the same word. =C2=A0(I should also say that the V has to be a= vowel, not a glide.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes

=20

On Wednesday, January 14, 2015 a= t 5:14 PM, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote:



On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:08 AM, And Rosta <and.rost= a@gmail.com> wrote:
I sugge= st that <tuitr, nitcion, pier, buenosaires> be deemed, by a general r= ule that I am not competent to formulate,=C2=A0orthographic variants of <= ;tuuitr, nitciion, piier, buuenosaires> .
<= br>
The rule would be simple: CiiV <-> CiV; CuuV <-> = CuV.

One could also require for aesthetic reasons = that the ii or uu be within a single word, although this is not strictly ne= cessary from the point of view of unambiguity.

mu&= #39;o mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
 =20 =20 =20 =20
=20

=20

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--14dae9cc90b80e7869050ca42a8a--