Received: from mail-la0-f58.google.com ([209.85.215.58]:64029) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YCme0-0000p4-9K; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:45 -0800 Received: by mail-la0-f58.google.com with SMTP id hz20sf2271816lab.3; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=qZIhxrNCxYSKoUvN5v/4NUb0dYkO/vfepYRLHn36JX0=; b=QLO5e0FLm6YG3AO5NJrLGJyHsT/E3XGsQ5riNUuB6vxHrGt2SnXlfIz49wB6sGWlOB 9Ms0EK5ZL52lZfMbKUFys+bXmzO8ZcWneIlShde5oDOQ1J0IjJxDk4o3wA7jlPdYqk89 QKOiSLKq28KF3svMDKpBX0xQ+wMT45LtZ26PYHkCGbDtAp/jVuFM5WUGngb3gVtP+lX3 PchTLbzKOd31p7H2sCBclQUhf+sWSWxqDidhtmXh+4dXPMUsQCYmwKFatO2oJJDsu0+n n7Vmyd2X7JkH97lWhcQFTsYvc8KdIT3tu55CPK6d5Je8u9flgfXSWjAceCmIpM2VN6W3 /rSw== X-Received: by 10.152.246.3 with SMTP id xs3mr74647lac.5.1421575177212; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:37 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.203.136 with SMTP id kq8ls467826lac.84.gmail; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.42.104 with SMTP id n8mr1896lbl.19.1421575176412; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v8si625265wif.1.2015.01.18.01.59.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e; Received: by mail-wg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x13so27064939wgg.5 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.108.202 with SMTP id hm10mr48304546wjb.72.1421575176313; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.86.200 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:59:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150117194920.GD14149@mercury.ccil.org> <424E268459184600B8F780EC386812C2@gmail.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 12:59:16 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Question on {z} vs. {dz} and {ts} To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d8a7667e03c050cea4307 X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 2015-01-18 12:30 GMT+03:00 Philip Newton : > On 18 January 2015 at 10:00, Gleki Arxokuna > wrote: > > And my question is: why not disallow [d͡z] since only Arabic has it. > > Say what? It’s news to me that Arabic has [dz)] as a unitary phoneme. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.215.58 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gleki.is.my.name[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders --089e010d8a7667e03c050cea4307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2015-01-18 12:30 GMT+03:00 Philip Newton : > On 18 January 2015 at 10:00, Gleki Arxokuna > wrote: > > And my question is: why not disallow [d=CD=A1z] since only Arabic has i= t. > > Say what? It=E2=80=99s news to me that Arabic has [dz)] as a unitary phon= eme. > You are right. Like with Chinese and Russian it's an allophone. So why do we have it if no major languages have it as an "basic" phoneme? I'm fine with it as an allophone but currenty it's not. > > And if you are talking about the sequence of sounds [dz], English has > the word =E2=80=98adze=E2=80=99. > > mu'o mi'e .filip. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e010d8a7667e03c050cea4307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-01-18 12:30 GMT+03:00 Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.c= om>:
On 18= January 2015 at 10:00, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:
> And my question is: why not disallow [d=CD=A1z] since only Arabic has = it.

Say what? It=E2=80=99s news to me that Arabic has [dz)] as a unitary= phoneme.

You are right. Like with Chin= ese and Russian it's an allophone.
So why do we have it if no= major languages have it as an "basic" phoneme?

I'm fine with it as an allophone but currenty it's not.

=C2=A0

And if you are talking about the sequence of sounds [dz], English has
the word =E2=80=98adze=E2=80=99.

mu'o mi'e .filip.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-li= st+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e010d8a7667e03c050cea4307--