Received: from mail-qa0-f64.google.com ([209.85.216.64]:51896) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YCs3L-0005vH-6X; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:16 -0800 Received: by mail-qa0-f64.google.com with SMTP id dc16sf4295868qab.9; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=NkVVRvnqshPGiL+dOjTLlfkA82dvSg4KoYMiIrf1/+E=; b=Dg9a61TJBiVe6RWhiN49my0M5ntsJAN+rdmmsuUAgeIndCIgbB2Duu++6Cg9z0iGpa rVVe4uCuJx5/k+eN0aQsR6HWVrYxrILGOSqelHEpnkzjwKoaJqKjylTW2k3oNtvi2svu 2s0q7ViHy8Bl22qYESV5e6gGEcXedRZxzW5DzewdZ6cd9zxnmRoYktYrOVOtVeXYtp80 y9M36JT33+pnBWs7Tdqn7Xahx3enO7PcAx+2V5vIlVyrXyA7LNruuCsp4X9aFTTuM1Dr F8KBGbgxIuO6/LMJgSTIaMyWUqi7dy8JF1PTW9RYMUHErEjzzwG0aqzqocHgSZqDKfKo TlpQ== X-Received: by 10.50.239.165 with SMTP id vt5mr184948igc.5.1421595968397; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.107.170.96 with SMTP id t93ls309777ioe.102.gmail; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.43.83.196 with SMTP id ah4mr11225442icc.25.1421595968182; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com. [2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n1si675321igp.0.2015.01.18.07.46.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236; Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z20so719669igj.3 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.46.165 with SMTP id u37mr26953561iou.80.1421595968041; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.115.137 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:46:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 10:46:07 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Question on {z} vs. {dz} and {ts} From: "Mike S." To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11378be8b07b2e050cef1a57 X-Original-Sender: maikxlx@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of maikxlx@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=maikxlx@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Today I was reminded of one "flaw" in phonology namely, the presense of > [z] in Lojban. > > Mandarin doesn't have it/has it as an allophone of t͡s. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_w-c7yM6beFUc_G-XCSLlRfrCewhQosFdQuPD1DwhuU/edit?usp=drive_web > > So my question is: what would be the minimally destroying changes to > remove [z] from the language or to remove {dz} instead so that Mandarin > speakers can use t͡s to mean [z]. I know that replacing "voiced/voiceless" > distinction with "non-aspirated-semi-voiced/aspirated-voiceless" might not > be embraced easily but since Chinese is one of the source languages may be > something could be done to make their life happier? > > I suppose to do that one needs to always insert buffer between {dz}, never > pronounce {dz} as an affricate and may be even always insert {y} in > {radzu'e}. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.216.64 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maikxlx[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different --001a11378be8b07b2e050cef1a57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Today I was reminded of one "flaw" in phonology namely, the presense of > [z] in Lojban. > > Mandarin doesn't have it/has it as an allophone of t=CD=A1s. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_w-c7yM6beFUc_G-XCSLlRfrCewhQosFdQuPD= 1DwhuU/edit?usp=3Ddrive_web > > So my question is: what would be the minimally destroying changes to > remove [z] from the language or to remove {dz} instead so that Mandarin > speakers can use t=CD=A1s to mean [z]. I know that replacing "voiced/voic= eless" > distinction with "non-aspirated-semi-voiced/aspirated-voiceless" might no= t > be embraced easily but since Chinese is one of the source languages may b= e > something could be done to make their life happier? > > I suppose to do that one needs to always insert buffer between {dz}, neve= r > pronounce {dz} as an affricate and may be even always insert {y} in > {radzu'e}. > I never knew that [z] was an allophone of Mandarin /t=CD=A1s/. I am curiou= s, do you know how well Mandarin speakers manage with Lojban's voiced plosives /b d g/? Are [b d g] allophones of Mandarin /p t k/? --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --001a11378be8b07b2e050cef1a57 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@g= mail.com> wrote:
Today I was reminded of one "flaw" in= phonology namely, the presense of [z] in Lojban.

Mandar= in doesn't have it/has it as an allophone of=C2=A0t=CD=A1s.
<= br>

So my question is: wh= at would be the minimally destroying changes to remove [z] from the languag= e or to remove {dz} instead so that Mandarin speakers can use=C2=A0t=CD=A1s= to mean [z]. I know that replacing "voiced/voiceless" distinctio= n with "non-aspirated-semi-voiced/aspirated-voiceless" might not = be embraced easily but since Chinese is one of the source languages may be = something could be done to make their life happier?

I suppose to do that one needs to always insert buffer between {dz}, neve= r pronounce {dz} as an affricate and may be even always insert {y} in {radz= u'e}.=C2=A0

I never knew th= at [z] was an allophone of Mandarin /t=CD=A1s/.=C2=A0 I am curious, do you = know how well Mandarin speakers manage with Lojban's voiced plosives /b= d g/?=C2=A0 Are [b d g] allophones of Mandarin /p t k/?

=




=C2=A0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--001a11378be8b07b2e050cef1a57--