Received: from mail-pa0-f60.google.com ([209.85.220.60]:48873) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YCyN0-0005E3-6b; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:30:58 -0800 Received: by mail-pa0-f60.google.com with SMTP id rd3sf4458731pab.5; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:30:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=/NUbnS5uJBCLks/zgoEGyJvZx3zRHBnAXjyaVVOtMMo=; b=d8om5/bwBnr/oUhC2duzgkzEC3fFMFwo3WpXfFMKXlqJCXfwPAykXrmFfJB4fThVKO nybs6/vZNq4n2AxA8+NZR2jsw60v1f3ArFBOqL8vRXjzE6JtwfgyxYAvHYm9B0Ht/+cT jy54hGdz1tjnNh8rdKpuY67NkOtKEwy7WzyKcMCi4eFYzXAvDskxWoY6U8sbaaokrfwq b4XB+c/K9Q6Yfc7brs++DknExs6BOKgNBYkpbbWb+eG8uUBImuLcft49Uh9w5W8K5csC ZvhRX4MYfHaLJ992QPaLDNkwvrn7EkFlRlAP/6alx64OgkQEzFvZd/Vna1syL7ZZOG8Y hDfA== X-Received: by 10.182.230.133 with SMTP id sy5mr190336obc.1.1421620252427; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:30:52 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.182.28.40 with SMTP id y8ls825541obg.51.gmail; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:30:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.182.112.167 with SMTP id ir7mr3203387obb.29.1421620252271; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:30:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com. [107.14.166.227]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id lb6si1190332pab.1.2015.01.18.14.30.52 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:30:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=107.14.166.227; Received: from [98.122.190.249] ([98.122.190.249:47930] helo=bezitopo.org) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 72/EB-15759-B143CB45; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 22:30:51 +0000 Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0CE3B9B for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:30:50 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] Five-letter rule was Month Names Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:30:48 -0500 Message-ID: <74840668.8BirkNO9Do@caracal> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-43-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.8 X-Spam_score_int: 8 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: On Sunday, January 18, 2015 09:35:47 Jorge LlambĂ­as wrote: > Also "ai'amsi" would pass the five letter rule, so that's not a valid > justification for it. I take the five letter rule as an observation about > lujvo (and gismu obviously), not as a requirement for all brivla. > > If the necessary conditions for brivla listed by CLL were also sufficient > conditions, it might make sense to accept them as necessary even if > arbitrary, but since they are not sufficient, it doesn't make sense to > impose them as necessary for no reason. [...] Content analysis details: (0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: googlegroups.com] 2.7 DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL: Envelope sender listed in dnsbl.ahbl.org [listed in googlegroups.com.rhsbl.ahbl.org. IN] [A] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.220.60 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid On Sunday, January 18, 2015 09:35:47 Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote: > Also "ai'amsi" would pass the five letter rule, so that's not a valid > justification for it. I take the five letter rule as an observation about > lujvo (and gismu obviously), not as a requirement for all brivla. >=20 > If the necessary conditions for brivla listed by CLL were also sufficient > conditions, it might make sense to accept them as necessary even if > arbitrary, but since they are not sufficient, it doesn't make sense to > impose them as necessary for no reason. I'm not opposed to changing the five-letter rule to a second-consonant rule= ,=20 but as far as I know, it's still the five-letter rule. Pierre --=20 Jews use a lunisolar calendar; Muslims use a solely lunar calendar. --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.