Received: from mail-pa0-f58.google.com ([209.85.220.58]:34495) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1YdTMO-00010U-Gk; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:51:55 -0700 Received: by pablf10 with SMTP id lf10sf23727417pab.1; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=O9XsNCrbe7m7jSWMCiikSdb62eChfCgoRmTHUG0KxGQ=; b=UstqDqwjJcw+e47ZiXCbWP5KHPwAeCiwtG6hYmvRdf9tlk9wi9zneUmxef9kESxSnt hbeIrE9rlzRp/Q1lRrzKkO4oM3KMe5VMANqo4+x4v+JIxCWFGNo/ba/lr4oVB3Rk9HF6 thcxtCI/c3XpGRT/pcia0prUUeuuRuJbtJmU/MkJSt5Hc6uqZGy9dJFZmsTIC1JY8oFW wTmpaaoX32m1JVqm8ikLetX6px+MUVL7cnswC1mjAbnPul7lbrezezX/DdHZOkAr/YnV m+vT7oUOF3bdP8oGTlLZYl3hJdgOFp9yXmm2z1008VwSbmoRusRRYMzDJJ53lIUAsK1c KgZQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type:x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe; bh=O9XsNCrbe7m7jSWMCiikSdb62eChfCgoRmTHUG0KxGQ=; b=HNHpf9wpdHdmbLwjl1Nqd2nbHoMghF4X1QCvRmT1qAELVbMs6yLu6ymoV4IIxn2iKE F4+NywRlpFHdDM/T+5nHMuZMgLHyFWWV6TeEhbaop1hvEZCfuYnjNYXfXiD4oJIG9UxU lSM0w4tsa0pTdo4b6AE5OlTb3M3qXBiNNli2IPgbqaMoaPoECWhaug57Yhoyk8Ztx7SL O93nqzO1L5S+Be+JqeI2DiW8N7HGCX4nhDkjyNA+tPmked8bBy5aM/jYRHVR0QhcUCUg Ny8mcYdlMyLye3tmiwlpa9hz+LATnMADNABOYr+9L5oPNjrUVIbyHGCew6FadsfWi6R1 dMiw== X-Received: by 10.50.44.103 with SMTP id d7mr280927igm.9.1427935905888; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.23.76 with SMTP id k12ls1885128igf.3.canary; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.128.137 with SMTP id no9mr283666igb.10.1427935905584; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:51:44 -0700 (PDT) From: guskant To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <1542A73D520E49BDB44789AB54497FDC@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [bpfk] selma'o ZEhEI and PEG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_10_1688705485.1427935904387" X-Original-Sender: gusni.kantu@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - ------=_Part_10_1688705485.1427935904387 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_11_929207643.1427935904387" ------=_Part_11_929207643.1427935904387 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le jeudi 2 avril 2015 07:52:00 UTC+9, xorxes a =C3=A9crit : > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, guskant = >=20 > wrote: > >> >> If you don't mind changing the order of words around {ze'ei}, we could= =20 >> modify the definition of {ze'ei} of MAI so that the usage should be "X Y= bu=20 >> ze'ei". So the definition of {xo'e} will be as you said:=20 >> >> pa zo'e bu ze'ei >> > > Notice though that "pa zo'e bu" is a number, so "pa zo'e bu ze'ei" with= =20 > "ze'ei" in MAI, would be a free modifier, not a digit. > > (I think PA and lerfu should not mix together to form=20 > numbers/lerfu-strings, but that's a different discussion.) > > ua lu pa boi zo'e bu ze'ei=20 li'u drani .ei=20 Other selma'o that couldn't be extended by this method, besides PA, would= =20 > be ZO, LOhU, ZOI, ZEI, BY, BU, UI, tags, and maybe a few others. That's= =20 > because free modifiers are not all that free. > ie In order to apply {ze'ei} to those cmavo, keeping {zo'e bu ze'ei pa} form= =20 seems better, permitting the difference between semantics and syntax.=20 Actually, {ze'ei} is used only for definitions of experimental cmavo, and= =20 it means that {X bu ze'ei} cluster is always put at the beginning of=20 statement or fragment. Such {X bu ze'ei} cluster then can be naturally=20 regarded as covering the whole line of definition. I don't know if any=20 selma'o other than MAI can bring a better solution. =20 --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. ------=_Part_11_929207643.1427935904387 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Le jeudi 2 avril 2015 07:52:00 UTC+9, xorxes a =C3= =A9crit :


On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, gu= skant <gusni...@gmail.com> wrote:

 If you don't mind= changing the order of words around {ze'ei}, we could modify the definition= of {ze'ei} of MAI so that the usage should be "X Y bu ze'ei". So the defin= ition of {xo'e} will be as you said: 

pa zo'e= bu ze'ei

Notice though = that "pa zo'e bu" is a number, so "pa zo'e bu ze'ei" with "ze'ei" in MAI, w= ould be a free modifier, not a digit.

(I think PA = and lerfu should not mix together to form numbers/lerfu-strings, but that's= a different discussion.)


ua lu
pa boi zo'e bu ze'ei 
= li'u
drani  .ei 

Other selma'o that couldn't be extended by this method, b= esides PA, would be ZO, LOhU, ZOI, ZEI, BY, BU, UI, tags, and maybe a few o= thers. That's because free modifiers are not all that free.


ie
In ord= er to apply {ze'ei} to those cmavo, keeping {zo'e bu ze'ei pa} form seems b= etter, permitting the difference between semantics and syntax. Actually, {z= e'ei} is used only for definitions of experimental cmavo, and it means that= {X bu ze'ei} cluster is always put at the beginning of statement or fragme= nt. Such {X bu ze'ei} cluster then can be naturally regarded as covering th= e whole line of definition. I don't know if any selma'o other than MAI can = bring a better solution.
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
------=_Part_11_929207643.1427935904387-- ------=_Part_10_1688705485.1427935904387--