Received: from mail-lb0-f185.google.com ([209.85.217.185]:34588) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye1WH-0004xw-CP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:28 -0700 Received: by lbiv13 with SMTP id v13sf38685526lbi.1; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=sKmDOSEQUk84nce3qg+fVPV3Z5BwQlnFY8pRbDF6xIs=; b=e57WwrLi9oDgrR6QfLQ/wErNFlHfLvcn8BnbqzFjGwg/OM70ZVlzPcymCdiT4hyXza 7uQ7FdRGdQaSA8JlS11f697zJESBLFLr5Pi2n5O8SMwehV7EbQL2l4r68Zx1LSfo+Y2K HUU4flClAOhMyX+3R7EGKHKDKivhC80eZCS+N/2V8pfoIUYW224BV6atIu+jb6BKm8FC zvhqE8QPTPCm6kyD4SE7vn09uYXklLbbjrwoOoyHWjZZcW4iIv1nTvG9W9FbrlBYZw3Q rs+SVraL8aiUDsCYvnjyyAbu5t6zpqtjwvJW+IuSdXzuca1/22fLXFzHw8wBgAPlF1L6 aNOg== X-Received: by 10.152.3.99 with SMTP id b3mr21732lab.34.1428067213977; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.178.195 with SMTP id da3ls335056lac.30.gmail; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.14.38 with SMTP id m6mr583826lbc.12.1428067213486; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sf8si115880wic.2.2015.04.03.06.20.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c; Received: by mail-wi0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a2so139508916wia.0 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.19.65 with SMTP id c1mr33041068wie.49.1428067213397; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.56.72 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 06:20:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:20:13 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Improvements to fragments in ilmentufa parser From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53d592ff855550512d1ce9a X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - --bcaec53d592ff855550512d1ce9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > > There was a bug when editing this string: > fragment = expr:(ek free* / !term !tag quantifier / relative_clauses / > links / linkargs) {return _node("fragment", expr);} > > {reroi} is indeed parseable. > ui .o'u bu'o .i mi na pu jimpe lo du'u ma kau navmi I thought you used your tool to test your copy of PEG. > na .i mi na tolcau lo fukpi be PEG > But if we stick to this camxes-exp.js.peg then I can only suggest that I > create a web tool where you input this javascript PEG, press "compile" and > then get a working parser. Do you need it? Will it accelerate the > development? > simlu lo ka xamgu sidbo ki'e mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --bcaec53d592ff855550512d1ce9a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.n= ame@gmail.com> wrote:

There was a bug when editing = this string:
fragment =3D expr:(ek free* / !term !tag quantifier = / relative_clauses / links / linkargs) {return _node("fragment", = expr);}

{reroi} is indeed parseable.
<= /blockquote>

ui .o'u bu'o .i mi na pu jimpe lo d= u'u ma kau navmi=C2=A0

<= div>I thought you used your tool to test your copy of PEG.

na .i mi na tolcau lo fukpi be PEG<= /div>
=C2=A0
But if we stick to th= is camxes-exp.js.peg then I can only suggest that I create a web tool where= you input this javascript PEG, press "compile" and then get a wo= rking parser. Do you need it? Will it accelerate the development?

=C2=A0simlu lo ka xamgu sidb= o

ki'e mi'e xorxes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--bcaec53d592ff855550512d1ce9a--