Received: from mail-lb0-f187.google.com ([209.85.217.187]:33625) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Yfswv-0004Hb-9X; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:35 -0700 Received: by lbio15 with SMTP id o15sf30946217lbi.0; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=nrtqLDmE7/oH3rBpv0vxIAuA0HG4+xbP8bNjKHhKITs=; b=evy1PWP80+9cjkR70LhXKIAkl/sRJkz5GYh8tiNXE8JpiMkjQ2oeW6FILqqubpTaZB rQKnySexGHCI7VzT+3HOiXor+2ZFgz4yFrgrCH7OJXl6sN4yR9nsQjwR/P65QCFWm4qT x2wf98l/ULRSFFZyQYXpUjG2r+5vvXi044+H2wJE/tcos3tD3cfHGHKxeWjSAGlbxnFs BbpU1OJ6wHSECY02F1CGIMr0cgW64KOAiJ63JXPp0MeN1YJzGdC9aOXYGbjOIWTQ5kUx M7YE+8DCKqJa0bhRscc9359biVK4L7DWJVmwuZFU5nPhFCAa+/p8wsVtVGKz0EaUZWR9 Ed3g== X-Received: by 10.152.7.209 with SMTP id l17mr10911laa.4.1428510925819; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.87.81 with SMTP id v17ls230486laz.2.gmail; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.29.39 with SMTP id g7mr5058921lbh.1.1428510925348; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ec7si643621wib.3.2015.04.08.09.35.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::230; Received: by mail-wi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x7so37026499wia.0 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.123.67 with SMTP id ly3mr52452275wjb.105.1428510925199; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.240.197 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:35:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <957EE20153214A1BBC5BA1C4A0DD63FC@gmail.com> From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:35:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: te sumti detection using PEG To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01228942411d2b0513391e9d X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_bar: - --089e01228942411d2b0513391e9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-04-08 19:07 GMT+03:00 And Rosta : > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Gleki Arxokuna > wrote: > >> P.S. gua\spi was much better >> >> > What was the Guaspi rule? > It doesnt have a bridi head/tail distinction from which most complicacy comes: You say something like prami mi do or like love(you,I) So it's VSO, or more correctly V O1 O2 O3 ... > Does there exist a list of the alternative candidate rules for Lojban and > their pros and cons? > fi mi ta broda do - here, probably ta is x4 and do is x5. Or judging from {mi prami do} a nintadni can think that do is x2. Also ta might be x1 since nothing fills it so it might be reasonable to fill vacant slots in order. One might make a research of which system (as you can see there are different problems here) is expected more in nature (although which natlangs have positional case system??? a study of psychological acceptance of programming languages might be better). ke'u, I'm not interested in any solutions. Maybe one should formalize all possible solutions for each independent part of FA-autorestoration system and other members of BPFK will vote. > --And. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BPFK" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --089e01228942411d2b0513391e9d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= 2015-04-08 19:07 GMT+03:00 And Rosta <and.rosta@gmail.com>= :


On Wed, Apr 8, 201= 5 at 4:35 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com><= /span> wrote:
P.S. gua\spi was much bett= er


What was the Guaspi rule?

It doesnt have a bridi head/tail distinc= tion from which most complicacy comes:
You say something like
prami mi do=C2=A0
or like
love(you,I)
=
So it's VSO, or more correctly V O1 O2 O3 ...
=

Does there exist a= list of the alternative candidate rules for Lojban and their pros and cons= ?=C2=A0

fi mi ta br= oda do - here, probably ta is x4 and do is x5.
Or judging from {m= i prami do} a nintadni can think that do is x2.

Al= so ta might be x1 since nothing fills it so it might be reasonable to fill = vacant slots in order.

One might make a research o= f which system (as you can see there are different problems here) is expect= ed more in nature (although which natlangs have positional case system??? a= study of psychological acceptance of programming languages might be better= ).

ke'u, I'm not interested in any solutio= ns.=C2=A0
Maybe one should formalize all possible solutions for e= ach independent part of FA-autorestoration system and other members of BPFK= will vote.


--And.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--089e01228942411d2b0513391e9d--