Received: from mail-wi0-f192.google.com ([209.85.212.192]:34278) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Yg07j-00007y-3j; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:12 -0700 Received: by wivr20 with SMTP id r20sf21636838wiv.1; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe; bh=xfGZP4eWhOd97vA3mZmqIRBFgTRgGLfyEQ4xL9K6VI4=; b=kY4Uc2JkfXaMeDt1BBpDmBB8cl/Kekv0HRjxtcEQ/gdoYqdoGktjvlbdW6aT1nowbG uClNenBO4r9NpmZd8UO56y86DcR1dUAzTHK6GVQHg3AZQoPBnQZu8oOjdYbLdp2Ra6Yr ixSxOtjtY5T3C7pV1zfB/IooXj7NCsmCEZDWtovPjPr9EFQ9rtw8XfSVmZdUnyY1aC1o cvjFSDFvLLKGVwWsPszs3iOZ6p/w4K9m26qX8FGJu2y3virLwJlMWVO9d265d+PIodun FdhVC+bwBu+3NAVODh2ynQCkeYfpvI+qna321eF6Lg80FnR1oJEH44/G0QmNRJYnTT2m ZtXQ== X-Received: by 10.152.115.147 with SMTP id jo19mr41074lab.32.1428538504065; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.152.207.65 with SMTP id lu1ls231530lac.104.gmail; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.130.71 with SMTP id oc7mr3665927lbb.23.1428538503574; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sf8si711587wic.2.2015.04.08.17.15.03 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) client-ip=2a00:1450:400c:c05::236; Received: by mail-wi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id k4so73656441wiz.1 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.81.200 with SMTP id c8mr1258765wiy.49.1428538503495; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.56.18 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:15:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 21:15:03 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: FA as a TAG (Was: One cannot refer to inner nodes in Lojban PEG) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Llamb=C3=ADas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdb080c862b05133f8a6b X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_bar: - --f46d043bdb080c862b05133f8a6b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:02 PM, guskant wrote: > > Le mercredi 8 avril 2015 06:52:23 UTC+9, Jacob Errington a =C3=A9crit : >> >> >> .i ko'a brodrfV lo du'u broda <=3D> broda fV ko'a >> >> The definition should be then : > > .i ko'a brodrfV lo ka fV ce'u broda <=3D> broda fV ko'a > I don't know. Is it different from "ckaji"? .i ca'e ko'e du lo ka ce'u citka lo cakla kei lo ka lo cakla cu se citka ce'u .i ca'e ko'a citka lo cakla .i xu ko'a brodrfa ko'e .i xu ko'a brodrfe ko'e .i xu ko'a brodrfi ko'e The problem is that FA doesn't deal with propositions or with properties. A proposition is independent of the text used to express it. A property also is independent of the text used to express it. Different texts can be used to express the same proposition, or the same property. We can't have predicates that relate a proposition or a property to its "fa-argument", its "fe-argument", and so on, because propositions/properties don't have such things. It is only some of the texts used to express the propositions/properties that can may consist of a predicate with fa-/fe-/fi-arguments, but not the du'u/ka themselves. We could have "ko'a brodrfa lu lo nixli cu citka lo cakla li'u" meaning that "ko'a du lo nixli", (via "ko'a du la'e lo'u lo nixli le'u") but I don't think it really makes sense with du'u or ka. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. --f46d043bdb080c862b05133f8a6b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:02 PM, guskant <gusni.kantu@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
Le mercredi 8 avril 2015 06:52:23 UTC+9, Jacob Errington a =C3=A9crit= =C2=A0:

.i ko= 'a brodrfV lo du'u broda <=3D> broda fV ko'a

The definition should be = then :

.i ko'a brodrfV lo ka fV ce'u broda= <=3D> broda fV ko'a

= I don't know. Is it different from "ckaji"?=C2=A0
<= br>
.i ca'e ko'e du lo ka ce'u citka lo cakla kei lo = ka lo cakla cu se citka ce'u

.i ca'e ko= 9;a citka lo cakla

.i xu ko'a brodrfa ko'e= .i xu ko'a brodrfe ko'e .i xu ko'a brodrfi ko'e
=
The problem is that FA doesn't deal with propositions or= with properties. A proposition is independent of the text used to express = it. A property also is independent of the text used to express it. Differen= t texts can be used to express the same proposition, or the same property.= =C2=A0

We can't have predicates that relate a = proposition or a property to its "fa-argument", its "fe-argu= ment", and so on, because propositions/properties don't have such = things. It is only some of the texts used to express the propositions/prope= rties that can may consist of a predicate with fa-/fe-/fi-arguments, but no= t the du'u/ka themselves.

We could have "= ko'a brodrfa lu lo nixli cu citka lo cakla li'u" meaning that = "ko'a du lo nixli", (via "ko'a du la'e lo'u = lo nixli le'u") but I don't think it really makes sense with d= u'u or ka.

mu'o mi'e xorxes
=

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list= +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit http= s://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--f46d043bdb080c862b05133f8a6b--