Received-SPF: none (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) client-ip=69.168.97.48;
X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Iu8nLtPg c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=8WxDmEN+yG9ijBF2nxzWZQ==:117 a=8WxDmEN+yG9ijBF2nxzWZQ==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=zx0GPhIIxR8A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=JNFw9bs7AAAA:8 a=e9J7MTPGsLIA:10 a=-Y53KbbiMRi-8dqvWssA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-CM-Score: 0
X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine
Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: 45.37.90.97 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bezitopo.org)
Received: from [45.37.90.97] ([45.37.90.97:36393] helo=bezitopo.org)
	by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <phma@bezitopo.org>)
	(ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) 
	id 11/D5-14540-89F04355; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:27:04 -0400
Received: from caracal.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bezitopo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F0F46F8
	for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:27:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@bezitopo.org>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Type-3 fu'ivla
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:26:59 -0400
Message-ID: <3437413.pSJnAqNUHa@caracal>
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-48-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <etPan.552dd870.63f0adee.6b90@Alexs-MacBook-Air-2.local>
References: <2784442.v0lozh8p0x@caracal> <etPan.552dd870.63f0adee.6b90@Alexs-MacBook-Air-2.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Original-Sender: phma@bezitopo.org
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;       spf=none
 (google.com: phma@bezitopo.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=phma@bezitopo.org
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>,
 <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe>
X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Spam_score: -1.9
X-Spam_score_int: -18
X-Spam_bar: -

On Tuesday, April 14, 2015 23:18:08 Alex Burka wrote:
> Given that type-3 fu'ivla are pretty much a convention anyway, these seem
> reasonable to me, especially #1. I don't see a big problem with so-called
> "type-3.5 fu'ivla" such as {djarspageti} or {sparfaiu}. And I guess
> {xoxrbeba} would be type 4, technically.

Are you contradicting yourself or disagreeing with me? In #2, I'm proposing 
that whether a fu'ivla is type-3 or type-4 be determined purely 
morphologically, ignoring whether the rafsi in the type-3 actually belongs to 
any gismu. Thus "xoxrbeba" is type-3, just as "bakrkobu" is type-3.

Pierre
-- 
The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.