Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of durka42@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229 as permitted sender) client-ip=2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229;
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:17:44 -0400
From: Alex Burka <durka42@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <etPan.55382c18.706d9b62.ccaf@seas0818.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>
Subject: [bpfk] tagged termsets
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="55382c18_7b7352c5_ccaf"
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Spam_score: -1.7
X-Spam_score_int: -16
X-Spam_bar: -

--55382c18_7b7352c5_ccaf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

I apologize if I'm bringing up a sore subject that's been discussed before.=
 But I found a parsing difference between jbofi'e and camxes:

Text in question: {bai nu'i ge da gi de}, i.e. a forethought termset inside=
 (or so I thought) a modal tag

jbofi'e output:=C2=A0(0[{bai <nu'i (1[ge da gi de] NU'U)1>} VAU])0
camxes output:=C2=A0([{bai KU} {nu'i ge da NUhU gi de NUhU}] VAU)

Apparently, jbofi'e regards the termset as inside the modal, while camxes d=
oesn't. This seems quite significant, since if I added a selbri {bai nu'i g=
e da gi de broda}, the x1 of broda is either {zo'e} or {da}+{de}, depending=
 on whether the termset is encapsulated by the modal or not.

Is this a known parsing difference? Is it related to gek-termsets? Do I sim=
ply still not understand termsets?

- mu'o mi'e durkavore

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--55382c18_7b7352c5_ccaf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<html><head><style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style>=
</head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -web=
kit-line-break: after-white-space;">I apologize if I'm bringing up a sore s=
ubject that's been discussed before. But I found a parsing difference betwe=
en jbofi'e and camxes:<div><br></div><div>Text in question: {bai nu'i ge da=
 gi de}, i.e. a forethought termset inside (or so I thought) a modal tag</d=
iv><div><br></div><div>jbofi'e output:&nbsp;(0[{bai &lt;nu'i (1[ge da gi de=
] NU'U)1&gt;} VAU])0</div><div>camxes output:&nbsp;([{bai KU} {nu'i ge da N=
UhU gi de NUhU}] VAU)</div><div><br></div><div>Apparently, jbofi'e regards =
the termset as inside the modal, while camxes doesn't. This seems quite sig=
nificant, since if I added a selbri {bai nu'i ge da gi de broda}, the x1 of=
 broda is either {zo'e} or {da}+{de}, depending on whether the termset is e=
ncapsulated by the modal or not.</div><div><br></div><div>Is this a known p=
arsing difference? Is it related to gek-termsets? Do I simply still not und=
erstand termsets?</div><div><br></div><div>- mu'o mi'e durkavore</div><div>=
<br></div></body></html>

<p></p>

-- <br />
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &=
quot;BPFK&quot; group.<br />
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e=
mail to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com">bpfk-list=
+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
To post to this group, send email to <a href=3D"mailto:bpfk-list@googlegrou=
ps.com">bpfk-list@googlegroups.com</a>.<br />
Visit this group at <a href=3D"http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list">ht=
tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list</a>.<br />
For more options, visit <a href=3D"https://groups.google.com/d/optout">http=
s://groups.google.com/d/optout</a>.<br />

--55382c18_7b7352c5_ccaf--