From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Mar 07 16:54:01 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:54:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B091s-0004VF-Tl for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:54:00 -0800 Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:54:00 -0800 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Trying again. Message-ID: <20040308005400.GS11847@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 32 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce Does anyone have a problem with Wednesday, 10 March 2003 (i.e. 4 days from now) for finalization of the current checkpoint? I notice that a very small number of shepherds have voted; are there people who want to resign, or is it just that the current checkpoint is boring, or what? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." -- Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui