From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 12 11:33:03 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BD6Ex-0007nx-5Q for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:33:03 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:33:03 -0700 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Changing checkpoints? Message-ID: <20040412183303.GH21966@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 41 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce Due to the amazing lack of shepherds for the current checkpoint, I'm thinking of moving to the Aspect checkpoint instead, which has just one selma'o (ZAhO), which xorxes is already doing work on. Does anyone mind? Does anyone care? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased. http://www.lojban.org/ *** loi pimlu na srana .i ti rocki morsi