From adam@pubcrawler.org Fri Apr 30 08:06:34 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal.seas.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.102]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.31) id 1BJZaz-0008TY-Po for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:06:34 -0700 Received: from clarion.cec.wustl.edu (clarion.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.3]) by postal.seas.wustl.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i3UF35T08758 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:03:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by clarion.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i3UF5lCe001387 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:05:48 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: clarion.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:05:47 -0500 (CDT) From: "Adam D. Lopresto" To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: gismu jbovlaste Keywords poll. In-Reply-To: <20040429224346.GD14939@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: References: <20040429224346.GD14939@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Status: No, -7.0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: -7.0/5.0 ---- Start SpamAssassin results -7.00 points, 5 required; * -0.0 -- Has a valid-looking References header * 0.0 -- Message-Id indicates a non-spam MUA (Pine) * -0.4 -- Has a X-Authentication-Warning header * -0.4 -- Has a In-Reply-To header * -0.5 -- BODY: Contains what looks like an email attribution * 0.1 -- BODY: Odd Letter Triples with JB * -5.4 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 1 to 10% [score: 0.0169] * -0.4 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text * 0.0 -- Reply with quoted text ---- End of SpamAssassin results X-archive-position: 46 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce My only reservation is that it seems there should be a way to see all such changes. From what I've seen of jbovlaste, it doesn't seem like one could easily do that. If there were just some query so one could look through and say "Sure, that's all fine." then I'd have no problems at all. As it is, I'll probably vote yes anyway, but I'd feel a lot better about it if it felt a bit more open. On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I would like everyone to go to > > http://www.lojban.org/tiki//tiki-index.php?page=BPFK+Section%3A+gismu+Issues > > and vote please. Barring discussion requiring a change of wording, the > poll closes in a week. > > As an example, I just added "arm (weapon)" to "xarci". > > -Robin > > -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ Why inflict pain on oneself, when so many others are ready to save us the trouble? -- George W. Pachaud