From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jun 06 17:02:30 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.32) id 1BX7av-0006Ob-He for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:02:29 -0700 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 17:02:29 -0700 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: gadri voting extended for 24 hours Message-ID: <20040607000229.GF15653@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20040606000113.GD22448@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040606000113.GD22448@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 57 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 05:01:13PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Voting closes at ~17:00 PST tomorrow. Or not. As discussion is currently being made WRT a minor change to lo'i, that seems imprudent. Furhermore, a user who has not participated at all until now came in mere minutes before voting was closed and registered a "No" vote. As voting No without an explanation is a hanging offense around here, I'm giving that person time to explain emself. John Cowan suggested a changing to the voting timeline that I'm inclined to agree with, so here's how it's going to work: Assuming that we have consensus minus one, voting on gadri closes once 24 hours passes with no changes, and no sign that the shepherd is about to make one. Let me know if you have a problem with that theory. -Robin