From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 19 12:59:39 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0jrU-0002dn-SL for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:59:37 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0jrT-0002de-W2 for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:59:36 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:59:35 -0700 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint Message-ID: <20070619195935.GD10939@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560706190902k51a8bf77kf59a887a7538cf16@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <925d17560706190902k51a8bf77kf59a887a7538cf16@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 144 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:02:13PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 6/9/07, Jorge Llambías wrote: > >I propose that we set the following deadlines for voting on the > >"Attitudinals and Discursives" checkpoint: > > > >June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > There having been no objections, and no votes against, I would > like to ask the jatna to declare this section checkpointed. My aplogies for being late to the party, but I'd really like to see some more verbiage around sei. "discursive (metalinguistic) bridi" doesn't have a lot of meaning by itself; can we expand on it a bit? Nothing serious. Perhaps "Used to express the speaker's state, opinion or beliefs about the surrounding sentence(s)."? (Assuming that's right; I never really grokked sei). Other than that, no objection at all. -Robin