From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 19 13:33:53 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0kOc-0003cl-2o for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:50 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.249]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0kOZ-0003ca-0r for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:49 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b21so522025ana for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iqDzrBD/O8wS0Io12vwbur9yjfyGqcOzYmojL2XYTYrkxAHq1XM5Wuumzvk/OgqMzLYqJN1COViPMBhrYS06KcAZdYe6fhzJvIOZ1Raw/zF8/ctU/AJfRAQZeAGnLnfFVPkvG/IV9t/P524U92FZGd2mO0ZONbINPhZ534CkgX4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=g2LM6eWDVcyskpkW5JZCXgsOxKhG3SQlWf9U3Z6eN+71/ddKRGZzwrUUyRvLctVD3zv1ceWWoNEUeM7f0IsWg8DCsODyAJtkKfnvI0IB6ta4qEzgv61Hg1IP6LVYtIDP7J+YcThrpVAeHyhv8xVULjgd/7KC5OXpVYFo5jFV+bA= Received: by 10.100.140.6 with SMTP id n6mr3852395and.1182285225487; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.42.17 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560706191333h4d81d699l838256c07305d859@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:33:45 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint In-Reply-To: <20070619195935.GD10939@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560706190902k51a8bf77kf59a887a7538cf16@mail.gmail.com> <20070619195935.GD10939@digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 145 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce On 6/19/07, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:02:13PM -0300, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > On 6/9/07, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > >I propose that we set the following deadlines for voting on the > > >"Attitudinals and Discursives" checkpoint: > > > > > >June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > > There having been no objections, and no votes against, I would > > like to ask the jatna to declare this section checkpointed. > > My aplogies for being late to the party, but I'd really like to see > some more verbiage around sei. "discursive (metalinguistic) bridi" > doesn't have a lot of meaning by itself; can we expand on it a bit? > Nothing serious. Perhaps "Used to express the speaker's state, > opinion or beliefs about the surrounding sentence(s)."? (Assuming > that's right; I never really grokked sei). > > Other than that, no objection at all. OK, I have added that, and a clarification from Lojbab (which I received late because he had sent it to an account I no longer use). We might allow a couple more days to give a chance to those who had already voted to review. ki'e mi'e xorxes