From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 07 15:01:47 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IIX7a-0003yy-4R for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:01:46 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IIX7W-0003yo-Mr for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:01:45 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 4so435213nfv for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lvw1SXonxheAswifhqYbkqGDwZhvS/KhmTIo9+F1H+0aMdjNHCzxD4juJLZbfc8mXqKqZ0yK6gRyk4Pt30h/SK+E8t0IWaF1Uol/NfXdsigdxHRjNGFFpL4Xmr+pKzn1SJucz62lIYfLMbrd5fcuWi6EvtLT0GSsLLCTH9xpIzw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hL4JWnnVRKDDnAqEoEkq7QHpxoc5jxkvCzATRMIY/+cMgycEAOCQoHLPhO6YGLVaShlAhl4019SK11OhmwC3mcQNB9yo4h5WJxhY90gFhNcEqj3t0A2h7psEWUlUbqVfzE8E3+aLNj26O3KrZAwTyd7XWxYostPNMr/dbecbDEk= Received: by 10.86.28.5 with SMTP id b5mr5514582fgb.1186524100496; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.86.13 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 15:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560708071501t2fc83885na316dc8bfb3d7330@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:01:40 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint In-Reply-To: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 168 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce Unofficially checkpointed: > June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > June 25: Vocatives COI DOI DOhU (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > July 16: Text Structure Discursives UI3a UI3c UI6 (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > July 23: Highlight Discursives UI3b (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > July 30: Intensifiers CAI (Shepherd: Theodore Reed) > August 6: Realis Attitudinals UI1realis (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) Next checkpoint: > August 13: Irrealis Attitudinals UI1irrealis (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) This section is currently vetoed, which means it won't be checkpointed as is. Questions: (1) Are the definition/examples of {ainai} the only objections that the objectors have to this section, or is there something else? (If I'm not mistaken the objectors are Robin and Arnt?) (2) If we don't reach an agreement by Monday, shall we move {ai} to its own section and approve the rest, or should someone else take over as shepherd and propose changes? Every member is encouraged to read the section, comment if appropriate, and vote, as this has been so far the most contentious section of this series. ki'e mi'e xorxes