From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Aug 08 07:33:48 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IImba-0008Mb-HM for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:33:47 -0700 Received: from express.cec.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.16]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IImbV-0008Lx-4x for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:33:46 -0700 Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (hive.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.14]) by express.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id l78EXXOM003372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:33:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l78EXXRi015829; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:33:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id l78EXXjr015826; Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:33:33 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: hive.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:33:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Adam D. Lopresto" To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint In-Reply-To: <925d17560708071501t2fc83885na316dc8bfb3d7330@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560708071501t2fc83885na316dc8bfb3d7330@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-58716651-2031779851-1186583612=:14763" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. X-archive-position: 169 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce ---58716651-2031779851-1186583612=:14763 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by express.cec.wustl.edu id l78EXXOM003372 On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Jorge Llamb=C3=ADas wrote: > Unofficially checkpointed: > > June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > June 25: Vocatives COI DOI DOhU (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > July 16: Text Structure Discursives UI3a UI3c UI6 (Shepherd: Jorge Ll= ambias) > > July 23: Highlight Discursives UI3b (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > July 30: Intensifiers CAI (Shepherd: Theodore Reed) > > August 6: Realis Attitudinals UI1realis (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) >=20 > Next checkpoint: > > August 13: Irrealis Attitudinals UI1irrealis (Shepherd: Jorge Llambia= s) > >=20 > This section is currently vetoed, which means it won't be checkpointed = as is. >=20 > Questions: > (1) Are the definition/examples of {ainai} the only objections that the > objectors have to this section, or is there something else? (If I'm not > mistaken the objectors are Robin and Arnt?) I didn't vote to veto it, but I was sitting on the fence, leaning toward = a veto (and waiting to see how things played out). My issue wasn't {.ai na= i}, though. My objections were to {.e'e} and {.e'i}, which I felt were needlessly tinkered with. None of the other issues are deal-breakers for= me. > (2) If we don't reach an agreement by Monday, shall we move {ai} > to its own section and approve the rest, or should someone else take > over as shepherd and propose changes? >=20 > Every member is encouraged to read the section, comment if > appropriate, and vote, as this has been so far the most contentious > section of this series. >=20 > ki'e mi'e xorxes >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ "Just once, I wish we would encounter an alien menace that wasn't immune = to bullets." --The Brigadier, "Dr. Who" ---58716651-2031779851-1186583612=:14763--