From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Aug 12 11:17:39 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IKI0P-0002Xx-CC for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:17:37 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IKI0K-0002Xg-G4 for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:17:37 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CF094769 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:17:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id l7CIHKir009575 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:17:20 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id l7CIHKfP009574 for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:17:20 +0200 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:17:19 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint Message-ID: <20070812181719.GL31755@nvg.org> References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560708071501t2fc83885na316dc8bfb3d7330@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 170 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 09:33:32AM -0500, Adam D. Lopresto wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > > Unofficially checkpointed: > > > June 18: Digressives SEI SEhU TO TOI (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > June 25: Vocatives COI DOI DOhU (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > July 16: Text Structure Discursives UI3a UI3c UI6 (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > July 23: Highlight Discursives UI3b (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > July 30: Intensifiers CAI (Shepherd: Theodore Reed) > > > August 6: Realis Attitudinals UI1realis (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > > Next checkpoint: > > > August 13: Irrealis Attitudinals UI1irrealis (Shepherd: Jorge Llambias) > > > > > > This section is currently vetoed, which means it won't be checkpointed as is. > > > > Questions: > > (1) Are the definition/examples of {ainai} the only objections that the > > objectors have to this section, or is there something else? (If I'm not > > mistaken the objectors are Robin and Arnt?) > > I didn't vote to veto it, but I was sitting on the fence, leaning toward a > veto (and waiting to see how things played out). My issue wasn't {.ai nai}, > though. My objections were to {.e'e} and {.e'i}, which I felt were > needlessly tinkered with. None of the other issues are deal-breakers for me. I agree with the above objections. > > (2) If we don't reach an agreement by Monday, shall we move {ai} > > to its own section and approve the rest, or should someone else take > > over as shepherd and propose changes? > > > > Every member is encouraged to read the section, comment if > > appropriate, and vote, as this has been so far the most contentious > > section of this series. What is the next section in the series? Is there a wiki page on the schedule, or could you, Jorge, make one? -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule. Ice is cool.