From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 29 11:06:47 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KkN8x-000062-Ke for bpfk-real@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:06:47 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KkN8t-00005h-Cz for bpfk@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:06:47 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no [129.241.210.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DFF947B0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m8TI5sP1012468 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:05:54 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id m8TI5s0f012467 for bpfk@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:05:54 +0200 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:05:54 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: bpfk@lojban.org Subject: [BPFK] Re: New taskmaster, next checkpoint (repost due to technical difficulties) Message-ID: <20080929180554.GH2447@nvg.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 178 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:03:50PM +1300, LakMeer Kravid wrote: > Greetings BPFK Commissioners! I have been introduced to the bpfk-announce list. > > If you have not yet heard, I have been appointed as taskmaster. I > shall be collecting weekly votes on the bpfk checkpoints, which will > happen on saturdays (GMT). If anyone wants to stall the vote in order > to discuss any checkpoint further, they are welcome to, the weekly > deadlines are just to help keep thing rolling over. Welcome! Your assistance is much appreciated. We very much need someone to boss us around. :-) > This week I'm changing the current checkpoint to CAI, and putting > Irrealis on hold. It's already Friday here, so the vote call for this > checkpoint will be next Saturday, 4 Oct GMT. Just a quick rundown on the terminology: - A section is the smallest unit of BPFK work, done by a shepherd - A checkpoint is a collection of sections, which are deemed to belong together because of interconnectedness. A checkpoint is completed (approved) when all of its sections are approved. As I understand it, you want Ted to start working on Intensifiers right away. Is this correct? -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ Q: How many Prolog programmers does it take to replace a light bulb? A: no.